Proximal Iteration for Nonlinear Adaptive Lasso
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Augmenting a smooth cost function with an ℓ1 penalty allows analysts to efficiently conduct estimation and variable selection simultaneously in sophisticated models and can be efficiently implemented using proximal gradient methods. However, one drawback of the ℓ1 penalty is bias: nonzero parameters are underestimated in magnitude, motivating techniques such as the Adaptive Lasso which endow each parameter with its own penalty coefficient. But it's not clear how these parameter-specific penalties should be set in complex models. In this article, we study the approach of treating the penalty coefficients as additional decision variables to be learned in a textitMaximum a Posteriori manner, developing a proximal gradient approach to joint optimization of these together with the parameters of any differentiable cost function. Beyond reducing bias in estimates, this procedure can also encourage arbitrary sparsity structure via a prior on the penalty coefficients. We compare our method to implementations of specific sparsity structures for non-Gaussian regression on synthetic and real datasets, finding our more general method to be competitive in terms of both speed and accuracy. We then consider nonlinear models for two case studies: COVID-19 vaccination behavior and international refugee movement, highlighting the applicability of this approach to complex problems and intricate sparsity structures.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2024.
Builds on
4 of 85 references.
References · 4
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2017TensorFlow Distributionscited by 106
- 2014Convergence of Stochastic Proximal Gradient Algorithmcited by 17
- 2019A Bayesian Lasso based Sparse Learning Modelcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.