Upcycling Noise for Federated Unlearning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning
Abstract (arXiv)
In Federated Learning (FL), multiple clients collaboratively train a model without sharing raw data. This paradigm can be further enhanced by Differential Privacy (DP) to protect local data from information inference attacks and is thus termed DPFL. An emerging privacy requirement, ``the right to be forgotten'' for clients, poses new challenges to DPFL but remains largely unexplored. Despite numerous studies on federated unlearning (FU), they are inapplicable to DPFL because the noise introduced by the DP mechanism compromises their effectiveness and efficiency. In this paper, we propose Federated Unlearning with Indistinguishability (FUI) to unlearn the local data of a target client in DPFL for the first time. FUI consists of two main steps: local model retraction and global noise calibration, resulting in an unlearning model that is statistically indistinguishable from the retrained model. Specifically, we demonstrate that the noise added in DPFL can endow the unlearning model with a certain level of indistinguishability after local model retraction, and then fortify the degree of unlearning through global noise calibration. Additionally, for the efficient and consistent implementation of the proposed FUI, we formulate a two-stage Stackelberg game to derive optimal unlearning strategies for both the server and the target client. Privacy and convergence analyses confirm theoretical guarantees, while experimental results based on four real-world datasets illustrate that our proposed FUI achieves superior model performance and higher efficiency compared to mainstream FU schemes. Simulation results further verify the optimality of the derived unlearning strategies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 7 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2024.
Builds on
7 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2022Federated Unlearning: How to Efficiently Erase a Client in FL?12 Jul
- 2022Federated Unlearning with Knowledge Distillation24 Jan
Other references · 5
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
- 2019Differential Privacy-enabled Federated Learning for Sensitive Health Datacited by 44
- 2017Learning Differentially Private Recurrent Language Modelscited by 32
- 2023Get Rid Of Your Trail: Remotely Erasing Backdoors in Federated Learningcited by 12
- 2023Strategic Data Revocation in Federated Unlearningcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.