mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BadGPT-4o: stripping safety finetuning from GPT models

arXiv 2412.05346 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2024cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show a version of Qi et al. 2023's simple fine-tuning poisoning technique strips GPT-4o's safety guardrails without degrading the model. The BadGPT attack matches best white-box jailbreaks on HarmBench and StrongREJECT. It suffers no token overhead or performance hits common to jailbreaks, as evaluated on tinyMMLU and open-ended generations. Despite having been known for a year, this attack remains easy to execute.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Unveiling the Safety of GPT-4o: An Empirical Study using Jailbreak Attacks
  2. 2025Fine-Tuning Jailbreaks under Highly Constrained Black-Box Settings: A Three-Pronged Approach
  3. 2024Badllama 3: removing safety finetuning from Llama 3 in minutes
  4. 2024Red Teaming GPT-4V: Are GPT-4V Safe Against Uni/Multi-Modal Jailbreak Attacks?
  5. 2025SoK: A Comprehensive Security Analysis of Jailbreak Resilience in GPT and DeepSeek Models
  6. 2026PatchBench: Measuring Collateral Damage in Activation Patching
  7. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks
  8. 2024All in How You Ask for It: Simple Black-Box Method for Jailbreak Attacks