mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

S3: Synonymous Semantic Space for Improving Zero-Shot Generalization of Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2412.04925 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, many studies have been conducted to enhance the zero-shot generalization ability of vision-language models (e.g., CLIP) by addressing the semantic misalignment between image and text embeddings in downstream tasks. Although many efforts have been made, existing methods barely consider the fact that a class of images can be described by notably different textual concepts due to well-known lexical variation in natural language processing, which heavily affects the zero-shot generalization of CLIP. Therefore, this paper proposes a Synonymous Semantic Space (S3) for each image class, rather than relying on a single textual concept, achieving more stable semantic alignment and improving the zero-shot generalization of CLIP. Specifically, our S3 method first generates several synonymous concepts based on the label of each class by using large language models, and constructs a continuous yet compact synonymous semantic space based on the Vietoris-Rips complex of the generated synonymous concepts. Furthermore, we explore the effect of several point-to-space metrics on our S3, while presenting a point-to-local-center metric to compute similarity between image embeddings and the synonymous semantic space of each class, accomplishing effective zero-shot predictions. Extensive experiments are conducted across 17 benchmarks, including fine-grained zero-shot classification, natural distribution zero-shot classification, and open-vocabulary segmentation, and the results show that our S3 outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 10 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2024.

Builds on

10 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Just Shift It: Test-Time Prototype Shifting for Zero-Shot Generalization with Vision-Language Models19 Mar
  2. 2022Task Bias in Vision-Language Models8 Dec

Other references · 8

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  3. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  4. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
  5. 2022Language-driven Semantic Segmentationcited by 711
  6. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
  7. 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
  8. 2022DALL-E for Detection: Language-driven Compositional Image Synthesis for Object Detectioncited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Constrained Prompt Enhancement for Improving Zero-Shot Generalization of Vision-Language Models
  2. 2023UniFine: A Unified and Fine-grained Approach for Zero-shot Vision-Language Understanding
  3. 2023Benchmarking Zero-Shot Recognition with Vision-Language Models: Challenges on Granularity and Specificity
  4. 2023[CLS] Token is All You Need for Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentation
  5. 2024Grounding Descriptions in Images informs Zero-Shot Visual Recognition
  6. 2023Rewrite Caption Semantics: Bridging Semantic Gaps for Language-Supervised Semantic Segmentation
  7. 2025Data-Efficient Generalization for Zero-shot Composed Image Retrieval
  8. 2022VL-Taboo: An Analysis of Attribute-based Zero-shot Capabilities of Vision-Language Models