mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Achieving Group Fairness through Independence in Predictive Process Monitoring

arXiv 2412.04914 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predictive process monitoring focuses on forecasting future states of ongoing process executions, such as predicting the outcome of a particular case. In recent years, the application of machine learning models in this domain has garnered significant scientific attention. When using historical execution data, which may contain biases or exhibit unfair behavior, these biases may be encoded into the trained models. Consequently, when such models are deployed to make decisions or guide interventions for new cases, they risk perpetuating this unwanted behavior. This work addresses group fairness in predictive process monitoring by investigating independence, i.e. ensuring predictions are unaffected by sensitive group membership. We explore independence through metrics for demographic parity such as DeltaDP, as well as recently introduced, threshold-independent distribution-based alternatives. Additionally, we propose a composite loss function existing of binary cross-entropy and a distribution-based loss (Wasserstein) to train models that balance predictive performance and fairness, and allow for customizable trade-offs. The effectiveness of both the fairness metrics and the composite loss functions is validated through a controlled experimental setup.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2024.

Builds on

17 of 46 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  3. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  4. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  5. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  6. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  7. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  8. 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
  9. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
  10. 2015Clustering-Based Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 24
  11. 2022Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metriccited by 20
  12. 2021Creating Unbiased Public Benchmark Datasets with Data Leakage Prevention for Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 16
5 more
  1. 2022Fair Bayes-Optimal Classifiers Under Predictive Paritycited by 16
  2. 2019Fairness-Aware Process Miningcited by 9
  3. 2024Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning (Extended Version)cited by 5
  4. 2021Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Process Mining: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 4
  5. 2023A Collection of Simulated Event Logs for Fairness Assessment in Process Miningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.