mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prompting Large Language Models for Clinical Temporal Relation Extraction

arXiv 2412.04512 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objective: This paper aims to prompt large language models (LLMs) for clinical temporal relation extraction (CTRE) in both few-shot and fully supervised settings. Materials and Methods: This study utilizes four LLMs: Encoder-based GatorTron-Base (345M)/Large (8.9B); Decoder-based LLaMA3-8B/MeLLaMA-13B. We developed full (FFT) and parameter-efficient (PEFT) fine-tuning strategies and evaluated these strategies on the 2012 i2b2 CTRE task. We explored four fine-tuning strategies for GatorTron-Base: (1) Standard Fine-Tuning, (2) Hard-Prompting with Unfrozen LLMs, (3) Soft-Prompting with Frozen LLMs, and (4) Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) with Frozen LLMs. For GatorTron-Large, we assessed two PEFT strategies-Soft-Prompting and LoRA with Frozen LLMs-leveraging Quantization techniques. Additionally, LLaMA3-8B and MeLLaMA-13B employed two PEFT strategies: LoRA strategy with Quantization (QLoRA) applied to Frozen LLMs using instruction tuning and standard fine-tuning. Results: Under fully supervised settings, Hard-Prompting with Unfrozen GatorTron-Base achieved the highest F1 score (89.54%), surpassing the SOTA model (85.70%) by 3.74%. Additionally, two variants of QLoRA adapted to GatorTron-Large and Standard Fine-Tuning of GatorTron-Base exceeded the SOTA model by 2.36%, 1.88%, and 0.25%, respectively. Decoder-based models with frozen parameters outperformed their Encoder-based counterparts in this setting; however, the trend reversed in few-shot scenarios. Discussions and Conclusions: This study presented new methods that significantly improved CTRE performance, benefiting downstream tasks reliant on CTRE systems. The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate models and fine-tuning strategies based on task requirements and data availability. Future work will explore larger models and broader CTRE applications.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Relation Extraction Capabilities of LLMs on Clinical Text: A Bilingual Evaluation for English and Turkish
  2. 2023An Empirical Evaluation of Prompting Strategies for Large Language Models in Zero-Shot Clinical Natural Language Processing
  3. 2024The Limited Impact of Medical Adaptation of Large Language and Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Dissecting Clinical Reasoning in Language Models: A Comparative Study of Prompts and Model Adaptation Strategies
  5. 2023Aligning Large Language Models for Clinical Tasks
  6. 2026To Adapt or not to Adapt, Rethinking the Value of Medical Knowledge-Aware Large Language Models
  7. 2024Medical Adaptation of Large Language and Vision-Language Models: Are We Making Progress?
  8. 2026When Chain-of-Thought Backfires: Evaluating Prompt Sensitivity in Medical Language Models