mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Tile: A 2D Map of Ranking Scores for Two-Class Classification

arXiv 2412.04309 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2024cs.CV cs.LG cs.PFcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the computer vision and machine learning communities, as well as in many other research domains, rigorous evaluation of any new method, including classifiers, is essential. One key component of the evaluation process is the ability to compare and rank methods. However, ranking classifiers and accurately comparing their performances, especially when taking application-specific preferences into account, remains challenging. For instance, commonly used evaluation tools like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Precision/Recall (PR) spaces display performances based on two scores. Hence, they are inherently limited in their ability to compare classifiers across a broader range of scores and lack the capability to establish a clear ranking among classifiers. In this paper, we present a novel versatile tool, named the Tile, that organizes an infinity of ranking scores in a single 2D map for two-class classifiers, including common evaluation scores such as the accuracy, the true positive rate, the positive predictive value, Jaccard's coefficient, and all F-beta scores. Furthermore, we study the properties of the underlying ranking scores, such as the influence of the priors or the correspondences with the ROC space, and depict how to characterize any other score by comparing them to the Tile. Overall, we demonstrate that the Tile is a powerful tool that effectively captures all the rankings in a single visualization and allows interpreting them.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2024.

Builds on

5 of 41 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
  2. 2018Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with carecited by 91
  3. 2020How Trustworthy are Performance Evaluations for Basic Vision Tasks?cited by 14
  4. 2021The Hitchhiker's Guide to Prior-Shift Adaptationcited by 13
  5. 2022Extending F1 metric, probabilistic approachcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.