WithdrarXiv: A Large-Scale Dataset for Retraction Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Retractions play a vital role in maintaining scientific integrity, yet systematic studies of retractions in computer science and other STEM fields remain scarce. We present WithdrarXiv, the first large-scale dataset of withdrawn papers from arXiv, containing over 14,000 papers and their associated retraction comments spanning the repository's entire history through September 2024. Through careful analysis of author comments, we develop a comprehensive taxonomy of retraction reasons, identifying 10 distinct categories ranging from critical errors to policy violations. We demonstrate a simple yet highly accurate zero-shot automatic categorization of retraction reasons, achieving a weighted average F1-score of 0.96. Additionally, we release WithdrarXiv-SciFy, an enriched version including scripts for parsed full-text PDFs, specifically designed to enable research in scientific feasibility studies, claim verification, and automated theorem proving. These findings provide valuable insights for improving scientific quality control and automated verification systems. Finally, and most importantly, we discuss ethical issues and take a number of steps to implement responsible data release while fostering open science in this area.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
9 papers.
- 2025When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Researchcited by 26
- 2025Human-LLM Coevolution: Evidence from Academic Writingcited by 15
- 2025FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Paperscited by 14
- 2025Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluationcited by 12
- 2026SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignmentcited by 10
- 2026Semantic Search over 9 Million Mathematical Theoremscited by 8
- 2026TheoremGraph: Bridging Formal and Informal Mathematicscited by 5
- 2026SFBench: The SciFy Scientific Feasibility Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Imitation: A Framework and Benchmark for LLM-Assisted Peer Reviewcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Imitation: A Framework and Benchmark for LLM-Assisted Peer Review8 Oct 2026
- 2026SFBench: The SciFy Scientific Feasibility Benchmark28 Jun 2026
- 2026TheoremGraph: Bridging Formal and Informal Mathematics24 Jun 2026
- 2026Semantic Search over 9 Million Mathematical Theorems5 Feb 2026
- 2026SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment19 Jan 2026
- 2025FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Papers26 Nov 2025
- 2025Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluation28 May 2025
- 2025When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research17 May 2025
- 2025Human-LLM Coevolution: Evidence from Academic Writing13 Feb 2025