Measuring Fingerprints of Web-filtered Text Datasets and Fingerprint Propagation Through Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate fingerprints in pretraining datasets for large language models (LLMs) through dataset classification experiments. Building on prior work demonstrating the existence of fingerprints or biases in popular computer vision datasets, we analyze popular open-source pretraining datasets for LLMs derived from CommonCrawl including C4, RefinedWeb, DolmaCC, RedPajama-V2, FineWeb, and DCLM-Baseline. Despite those datasets being obtained with similar curation steps, neural networks can classify surprisingly well which dataset a single text sequence belongs to, significantly better than a human can. This indicates that small differences in filtering and processing pipelines induce fingerprints. Those fingerprints are evident in formatting, vocabulary, and content distributions, and can negatively impact cross-dataset generalization. Additionally, we show that these fingerprints propagate through training: sequences generated by models trained on those datasets can be accurately classified by a classifier trained on the original datasets. This can offer insights into data characteristics that are typically undisclosed by LLM developers, including pretraining mixture proportions and finetuning data sources.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.
Builds on
42 of 57 references.
References · 42
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
30 more
- 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
- 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
- 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
- 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 544
- 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 526
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
- 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 415
- 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 396
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 385
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 375
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
- 2023Language Modeling Is Compressioncited by 225
- 2022Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimationcited by 215
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
- 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 107
- 2023Efficient Online Data Mixing For Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 77
- 2023SlimPajama-DC: Understanding Data Combinations for LLM Trainingcited by 72
- 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 59
- 2023Paloma: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Model Fitcited by 53
- 2024A Decade's Battle on Dataset Bias: Are We There Yet?cited by 46
- 2024Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity Correlationscited by 46
- 2024BiMix: A Bivariate Data Mixing Law for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 23
- 2024Understanding Bias in Large-Scale Visual Datasetscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Modelscited by 32
- 2025Alignment Revisited: Are Large Language Models Consistent in Stated and Revealed Preferences?cited by 7
- 2025What Is The Political Content in LLMs' Pre- and Post-Training Data?cited by 7
- 2026The Announcement Carries the Cue: Markup, Boundaries, and the Notation of Pre-Training Corporacited by 0
- 2026The Announcement Carries the Cue: Markup, Boundaries, and the Notation of Pre-Training Corpora10 Aug 2026
- 2025What Is The Political Content in LLMs' Pre- and Post-Training Data?26 Sep 2025
- 2025Alignment Revisited: Are Large Language Models Consistent in Stated and Revealed Preferences?31 May 2025
- 2025Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models17 Feb 2025