mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PassionNet: An Innovative Framework for Duplicate and Conflicting Requirements Identification

arXiv 2412.01657 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2024cs.SE cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Early detection and resolution of duplicate and conflicting requirements can significantly enhance project efficiency and overall software quality. Researchers have developed various computational predictors by leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) potential to detect duplicate and conflicting requirements. However, these predictors lack in performance and requires more effective approaches to empower software development processes. Following the need of a unique predictor that can accurately identify duplicate and conflicting requirements, this research offers a comprehensive framework that facilitate development of 3 different types of predictive pipelines: language models based, multi-model similarity knowledge-driven and large language models (LLMs) context + multi-model similarity knowledge-driven. Within first type predictive pipelines landscape, framework facilitates conflicting/duplicate requirements identification by leveraging 8 distinct types of LLMs. In second type, framework supports development of predictive pipelines that leverage multi-scale and multi-model similarity knowledge, ranging from traditional similarity computation methods to advanced similarity vectors generated by LLMs. In the third type, the framework synthesizes predictive pipelines by integrating contextual insights from LLMs with multi-model similarity knowledge. Across 6 public benchmark datasets, extensive testing of 760 distinct predictive pipelines demonstrates that hybrid predictive pipelines consistently outperforms other two types predictive pipelines in accurately identifying duplicate and conflicting requirements. This predictive pipeline outperformed existing state-of-the-art predictors performance with an overall performance margin of 13% in terms of F1-score

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2024.

Builds on

17 of 75 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  5. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  6. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  7. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  8. 2021XLM-T: Multilingual Language Models in Twitter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyondcited by 114
  9. 2020ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generatorscited by 26
  10. 2021Physics-informed Learning for Identification and State Reconstruction of Traffic Densitycited by 13
  11. 2021Automatically detecting the conflicts between software requirements based on finer semantic analysiscited by 5
  12. 2023Transfer learning for conflict and duplicate detection in software requirement pairscited by 5
5 more
  1. 2018Dronology: An Incubator for Cyber-Physical System Researchcited by 3
  2. 2023Data Augmentation for Conflict and Duplicate Detection in Software Engineering Sentence Pairscited by 3
  3. 2023Few-shot learning for sentence pair classification and its applications in software engineeringcited by 2
  4. 2022A Prompt-based Few-shot Learning Approach to Software Conflict Detectioncited by 1
  5. 2024Requirements Elicitation in Government Projects: A Preliminary Empirical Studycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.