mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Personalized Coupled Tensor Decomposition for Multimodal Data Fusion: Uniqueness and Algorithms

arXiv 2412.01102 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2024cs.LG eess.SPcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Coupled tensor decompositions (CTDs) perform data fusion by linking factors from different datasets. Although many CTDs have been already proposed, current works do not address important challenges of data fusion, where: 1) the datasets are often heterogeneous, constituting different "views" of a given phenomena (multimodality); and 2) each dataset can contain personalized or dataset-specific information, constituting distinct factors that are not coupled with other datasets. In this work, we introduce a personalized CTD framework tackling these challenges. A flexible model is proposed where each dataset is represented as the sum of two components, one related to a common tensor through a multilinear measurement model, and another specific to each dataset. Both the common and distinct components are assumed to admit a polyadic decomposition. This generalizes several existing CTD models. We provide conditions for specific and generic uniqueness of the decomposition that are easy to interpret. These conditions employ uni-mode uniqueness of different individual datasets and properties of the measurement model. Two algorithms are proposed to compute the common and distinct components: a semi-algebraic one and a coordinate-descent optimization method. Experimental results illustrate the advantage of the proposed framework compared with the state of the art approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2024.

Builds on

21 of 81 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Spectral Variability in Hyperspectral Data Unmixing: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 45
  2. 2018Generalized Canonical Polyadic Tensor Decompositioncited by 34
  3. 2018Hyperspectral Super-Resolution: A Coupled Tensor Factorization Approachcited by 24
  4. 2019Spectrum Cartography via Coupled Block-Term Tensor Decompositioncited by 18
  5. 2022Personalized PCA: Decoupling Shared and Unique Featurescited by 17
  6. 2020Computing Large-Scale Matrix and Tensor Decomposition with Structured Factors: A Unified Nonconvex Optimization Perspectivecited by 14
  7. 2020A Flexible Optimization Framework for Regularized Matrix-Tensor Factorizations with Linear Couplingscited by 10
  8. 2018Super-Resolution for Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion Accounting for Seasonal Spectral Variabilitycited by 9
  9. 2018Hyperspectral Super-Resolution with Coupled Tucker Approximation: Recoverability and SVD-based algorithmscited by 9
  10. 2019Tensor Completion from Regular Sub-Nyquist Samplescited by 7
  11. 2016Tensor-Based Fusion of EEG and FMRI to Understand Neurological Changes in Schizophreniacited by 6
  12. 2022AFFIRM: Affinity Fusion-based Framework for Iteratively Random Motion correction of multi-slice fetal brain MRIcited by 5
9 more
  1. 2023Personalized Dictionary Learning for Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 5
  2. 2015Tensor Analysis and Fusion of Multimodal Brain Imagescited by 4
  3. 2016Common and Distinct Components in Data Fusioncited by 4
  4. 2021Stochastic Mirror Descent for Low-Rank Tensor Decomposition Under Non-Euclidean Lossescited by 4
  5. 2023Heterogeneous Matrix Factorization: When Features Differ by Datasetscited by 4
  6. 2016Double Coupled Canonical Polyadic Decomposition for Joint Blind Source Separationcited by 3
  7. 2022Deep Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion with Inter-image Variabilitycited by 2
  8. 2022Coupled CP tensor decomposition with shared and distinct components for multi-task fMRI data fusioncited by 2
  9. 2019Determining the Dimension and Structure of the Subspace Correlated Across Multiple Data Setscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.