BGM: Background Mixup for X-ray Prohibited Items Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current data-driven approaches for X-ray prohibited items detection remain under-explored, particularly in the design of effective data augmentations. Existing natural image augmentations for reflected light imaging neglect the data characteristics of X-ray security images. Moreover, prior X-ray augmentation methods have predominantly focused on foreground prohibited items, overlooking informative background cues. In this paper, we propose Background Mixup (BGM), a background-based augmentation technique tailored for X-ray security imaging domain. Unlike conventional methods, BGM is founded on an in-depth analysis of physical properties including: 1) X-ray Transmission Imagery: Transmitted X-ray pixels represent composite information from multiple materials along the imaging path. 2) Material-based Pseudo-coloring: Pseudo-coloring in X-ray images correlates directly with material properties, aiding in material distinction. Building upon the above insights, BGM mixes background patches across regions on both 1) texture structure and 2) material variation, to benefit models from complicated background cues. This enhances the model's capability to handle domain-specific challenges such as occlusion-induced discriminative imbalance. Importantly, BGM is orthogonal and fully compatible with existing foreground-focused augmentation techniques, enabling joint use to further enhance detection performance. Extensive experiments on multiple X-ray security benchmarks show that BGM consistently surpasses strong baselines, without additional annotations or significant training overhead. This work pioneers the exploration of background-aware augmentation in X-ray prohibited items detection and provides a lightweight, plug-and-play solution with broad applicability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2024.
Builds on
39 of 72 references.
References · 39
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
27 more
- 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
- 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
- 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
- 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,009
- 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
- 2020Simple Copy-Paste is a Strong Data Augmentation Method for Instance Segmentationcited by 595
- 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
- 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 529
- 2024YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 498
- 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 260
- 2021TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object Detectioncited by 218
- 2017Cut, Paste and Learn: Surprisingly Easy Synthesis for Instance Detectioncited by 209
- 2017Object Region Mining with Adversarial Erasing: A Simple Classification to Semantic Segmentation Approachcited by 201
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Image Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learningcited by 95
- 2023X-Adv: Physical Adversarial Object Attacks against X-ray Prohibited Item Detectioncited by 58
- 2019SIXray : A Large-scale Security Inspection X-ray Benchmark for Prohibited Item Discovery in Overlapping Imagescited by 52
- 2020Occluded Prohibited Items Detection: an X-ray Security Inspection Benchmark and De-occlusion Attention Modulecited by 39
- 2022Provable Domain Generalization via Invariant-Feature Subspace Recoverycited by 32
- 2021Towards Real-World Prohibited Item Detection: A Large-Scale X-ray Benchmarkcited by 31
- 2021Towards Real-world X-ray Security Inspection: A High-Quality Benchmark and Lateral Inhibition Module for Prohibited Items Detectioncited by 30
- 2020Towards Automatic Threat Detection: A Survey of Advances of Deep Learning within X-ray Security Imagingcited by 25
- 2024Fourier-basis Functions to Bridge Augmentation Gap: Rethinking Frequency Augmentation in Image Classificationcited by 18
- 2022PIDray: A Large-scale X-ray Benchmark for Real-World Prohibited Item Detectioncited by 17
- 2024AO-DETR: Anti-Overlapping DETR for X-Ray Prohibited Items Detectioncited by 9
- 2019The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Evaluating Convolutional Neural Networks for Prohibited Item Detection Using Real and Synthetically Composited X-ray Imagerycited by 5
- 2021Operationalizing Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Prohibited Object Detection in X-Ray Imagerycited by 5
- 2024Performance Evaluation of Segment Anything Model with Variational Prompting for Application to Non-Visible Spectrum Imagerycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.