Planning vs Reasoning: Ablations to Test Capabilities of LoRA layers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) layers have emerged as a promising approach for efficient model fine-tuning, but their capabilities and limitations have not been fully explored. This paper: 1) Investigates the fundamental question of whether LoRA layers are effective at increasing reasoning + planning abilities 2) We introduce HashChain Reasoning, a novel evaluation dataset that deterministically tests reasoning capabilities. Through systematic ablation studies on GPT-2, we demonstrate that reasoning capabilities appear to exist primarily in low-rank spaces and can be effectively enhanced using LoRA layers. The effective rank analysis of trained LoRA matrices reveals a 2-3x lower rank requirement for reasoning tasks compared to planning tasks, giving context on where LoRA layers would be effective. This also provides evidence for reasoning fundamentally preferring low-parameter spaces for generalization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Rank-1 LoRAs Encode Interpretable Reasoning Signals
- 2026Learning to Select, Not Relearn: Hard-Routed Mixtures of Reasoning LoRAs
- 2025Tina: Tiny Reasoning Models via LoRA
- 2025LoRA-PAR: A Flexible Dual-System LoRA Partitioning Approach to Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning
- 2025LoRA is All You Need for Safety Alignment of Reasoning LLMs
- 2026Flexi-LoRA with Input-Adaptive Ranks: Efficient Finetuning for Speech and Reasoning Tasks
- 2025From Efficiency to Adaptivity: A Deeper Look at Adaptive Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Enhancing Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning through Multi-Path Plan Aggregation