Beyond Surface Structure: A Causal Assessment of LLMs' Comprehension Ability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capability in natural language tasks, yet debate persists on whether they truly comprehend deep structure (i.e., core semantics) or merely rely on surface structure (e.g., presentation format). Prior studies observe that LLMs' performance declines when intervening on surface structure, arguing their success relies on surface structure recognition. However, surface structure sensitivity does not prevent deep structure comprehension. Rigorously evaluating LLMs' capability requires analyzing both, yet deep structure is often overlooked. To this end, we assess LLMs' comprehension ability using causal mediation analysis, aiming to fully discover the capability of using both deep and surface structures. Specifically, we formulate the comprehension of deep structure as direct causal effect (DCE) and that of surface structure as indirect causal effect (ICE), respectively. To address the non-estimability of original DCE and ICE -- stemming from the infeasibility of isolating mutual influences of deep and surface structures, we develop the corresponding quantifiable surrogates, including approximated DCE (ADCE) and approximated ICE (AICE). We further apply the ADCE to evaluate a series of mainstream LLMs, showing that most of them exhibit deep structure comprehension ability, which grows along with the prediction accuracy. Comparing ADCE and AICE demonstrates closed-source LLMs rely more on deep structure, while open-source LLMs are more surface-sensitive, which decreases with model scale. Theoretically, ADCE is a bidirectional evaluation, which measures both the sufficiency and necessity of deep structure changes in causing output variations, thus offering a more comprehensive assessment than accuracy, a common evaluation in LLMs. Our work provides new insights into LLMs' deep structure comprehension and offers novel methods for LLMs evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2024.
Builds on
28 of 76 references.
References · 28
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,162
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
16 more
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 742
- 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 316
- 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 306
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 302
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 270
- 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 232
- 2023Causal Parrots: Large Language Models May Talk Causality But Are Not Causalcited by 150
- 2023Can Large Language Models Infer Causation from Correlation?cited by 146
- 2024A Peek into Token Bias: Large Language Models Are Not Yet Genuine Reasonerscited by 73
- 2022A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Modelscited by 68
- 2024Quantifying and Mitigating Unimodal Biases in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Causal Perspectivecited by 39
- 2024Do Large Code Models Understand Programming Concepts? Counterfactual Analysis for Code Predicatescited by 14
- 2024Learning Beyond Pattern Matching? Assaying Mathematical Understanding in LLMscited by 9
- 2023NoisywikiHow: A Benchmark for Learning with Real-world Noisy Labels in Natural Language Processingcited by 8
- 2024Does Reasoning Emerge? Examining the Probabilities of Causation in Large Language Modelscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Assessing the Impact of Code Changes on the Fault Localizability of Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025DeduCE: Deductive Consistency as a Framework to Evaluate LLM Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026Does Topic Sentiment Cause Perceived Ideology? Comparing Human and LLM Annotations in Political News Articlescited by 0
- 2026Does Topic Sentiment Cause Perceived Ideology? Comparing Human and LLM Annotations in Political News Articles4 Jun 2026
- 2025DeduCE: Deductive Consistency as a Framework to Evaluate LLM Reasoning9 Apr 2025
- 2025Assessing the Impact of Code Changes on the Fault Localizability of Large Language Models6 Apr 2025