mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ABROCA Distributions For Algorithmic Bias Assessment: Considerations Around Interpretation

arXiv 2411.19090 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algorithmic bias continues to be a key concern of learning analytics. We study the statistical properties of the Absolute Between-ROC Area (ABROCA) metric. This fairness measure quantifies group-level differences in classifier performance through the absolute difference in ROC curves. ABROCA is particularly useful for detecting nuanced performance differences even when overall Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) values are similar. We sample ABROCA under various conditions, including varying AUC differences and class distributions. We find that ABROCA distributions exhibit high skewness dependent on sample sizes, AUC differences, and class imbalance. When assessing whether a classifier is biased, this skewness inflates ABROCA values by chance, even when data is drawn (by simulation) from populations with equivalent ROC curves. These findings suggest that ABROCA requires careful interpretation given its distributional properties, especially when used to assess the degree of bias and when classes are imbalanced.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2024.

Builds on

3 of 17 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
  2. 2021Towards Equity and Algorithmic Fairness in Student Grade Predictioncited by 13
  3. 2023Is Your Model "MADD"? A Novel Metric to Evaluate Algorithmic Fairness for Predictive Student Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.