NeuroAI for AI Safety
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI systems become increasingly powerful, the need for safe AI has become more pressing. Humans are an attractive model for AI safety: as the only known agents capable of general intelligence, they perform robustly even under conditions that deviate significantly from prior experiences, explore the world safely, understand pragmatics, and can cooperate to meet their intrinsic goals. Intelligence, when coupled with cooperation and safety mechanisms, can drive sustained progress and well-being. These properties are a function of the architecture of the brain and the learning algorithms it implements. Neuroscience may thus hold important keys to technical AI safety that are currently underexplored and underutilized. In this roadmap, we highlight and critically evaluate several paths toward AI safety inspired by neuroscience: emulating the brain's representations, information processing, and architecture; building robust sensory and motor systems from imitating brain data and bodies; fine-tuning AI systems on brain data; advancing interpretability using neuroscience methods; and scaling up cognitively-inspired architectures. We make several concrete recommendations for how neuroscience can positively impact AI safety.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 5.
11 papers.
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2026When Language Models Lose Their Mind: The Consequences of Brain Misalignmentcited by 2
- 2025An Affective-Taxis Hypothesis for Alignment and Interpretabilitycited by 1
- 2025BioBlue: Systematic runaway-optimiser-like LLM failure modes on biologically and economically aligned AI safety benchmarks for LLMs with simplified observation formatcited by 1
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability of Brain-to-Speech Models Across Speech Modescited by 1
- 2025Robusto-1 Dataset: Comparing Humans and VLMs on real out-of-distribution Autonomous Driving VQA from Perucited by 0
- 2025BIRD: Behavior Induction via Representation-structure Distillationcited by 0
- 2025Estimating Dimensionality of Neural Representations from Finite Samplescited by 0
- 2026A New Strategy for Artificial Intelligence: Training Foundation Models Directly on Human Brain Datacited by 0
- 2026How Much is Brain Data Worth for Machine Learning?cited by 0
- 2026World models of environment, agent and joint agent-environment systemscited by 0
- 2026World models of environment, agent and joint agent-environment systems23 Jul 2026
- 2026How Much is Brain Data Worth for Machine Learning?10 May 2026
- 2026When Language Models Lose Their Mind: The Consequences of Brain Misalignment24 Mar 2026
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability of Brain-to-Speech Models Across Speech Modes1 Feb 2026
- 2026A New Strategy for Artificial Intelligence: Training Foundation Models Directly on Human Brain Data17 Jan 2026
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networks24 Nov 2025
- 2025Estimating Dimensionality of Neural Representations from Finite Samples30 Sep 2025
- 2025BioBlue: Systematic runaway-optimiser-like LLM failure modes on biologically and economically aligned AI safety benchmarks for LLMs with simplified observation format2 Sep 2025
- 2025BIRD: Behavior Induction via Representation-structure Distillation29 May 2025
- 2025An Affective-Taxis Hypothesis for Alignment and Interpretability3 May 2025
- 2025Robusto-1 Dataset: Comparing Humans and VLMs on real out-of-distribution Autonomous Driving VQA from Peru10 Mar 2025