mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Derivation of Closed Form of Expected Improvement for Gaussian Process Trained on Log-Transformed Objective

arXiv 2411.18095 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Expected Improvement (EI) is arguably the most widely used acquisition function in Bayesian optimization. However, it is often challenging to enhance the performance with EI due to its sensitivity to numerical precision. Previously, Hutter et al. (2009) tackled this problem by using Gaussian process trained on the log-transformed objective function and it was reported that this trick improves the predictive accuracy of GP, leading to substantially better performance. Although Hutter et al. (2009) offered the closed form of their EI, its intermediate derivation has not been provided so far. In this paper, we give a friendly derivation of their proposition.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2024.

Builds on

6 of 12 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  2. 2021SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 230
  3. 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 149
  4. 2023Tree-Structured Parzen Estimator: Understanding Its Algorithm Components and Their Roles for Better Empirical Performancecited by 147
  5. 2022Constrained Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-box Functionscited by 49
  6. 2019BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian Optimizationcited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.