Stealthy Multi-Task Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are highly vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, raising serious safety concerns in the real-world systems. While prior work mainly explores single-task attacks or jointly degrading all tasks in multi-task models, practical scenarios often demand more selective and stealthy attack strategies. To address this challenge, we propose Stealthy Multi-Task Adversarial Attack (SMTA2), a novel framework that selectively degrades a targeted task while strictly preserving the performance of non-targeted tasks. We formulate this objective as a constrained multi-objective optimization problem and design task-aware adversarial perturbations that maximize degradation on the targeted task without causing collateral damage on non-targeted tasks. To enhance practicality, we further introduce an automated loss-weight tuning strategy that dynamically balances attack and preservation objectives. Experiments on two multi-task benchmarks NYUv2 and Cityscapes demonstrate that SMTA2 achieves strong attack performance on targeted tasks while maintaining non-targeted tasks intact on both undefended and adversarially trained models, establishing the first systematic framework for stealthy and selective multi-task attack framework.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 375
- 2022Auto-Lambda: Disentangling Dynamic Task Relationshipscited by 73
- 2021Mind the box: l1-APGD for sparse adversarial attacks on image classifierscited by 51
12 more
- 2021Adversarial Attacks are Reversible with Natural Supervisioncited by 47
- 2022A Survey of Multi-task Learning in Natural Language Processing: Regarding Task Relatedness and Training Methodscited by 42
- 2021Physical Adversarial Attacks on an Aerial Imagery Object Detectorcited by 35
- 2016Globally Normalized Transition-Based Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2024Unleashing the Power of Multi-Task Learning: A Comprehensive Survey Spanning Traditional, Deep, and Pretrained Foundation Model Erascited by 26
- 2021Adversarial Robustness in Multi-Task Learning: Promises and Illusionscited by 17
- 2023Deep Transfer Learning for Intelligent Vehicle Perception: a Surveycited by 10
- 2023Defense against Adversarial Cloud Attack on Remote Sensing Salient Object Detectioncited by 8
- 2020Multi-Task Adversarial Attackcited by 7
- 2021Semantically Stealthy Adversarial Attacks against Segmentation Modelscited by 7
- 2024Adversarial Attacks on Hidden Tasks in Multi-Task Learningcited by 2
- 2023Attacking All Tasks at Once Using Adversarial Examples in Multi-Task Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.