mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast, Precise Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimization

arXiv 2411.17071 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Thompson sampling (TS) has optimal regret and excellent empirical performance in multi-armed bandit problems. Yet, in Bayesian optimization, TS underperforms popular acquisition functions (e.g., EI, UCB). TS samples arms according to the probability that they are optimal. A recent algorithm, P-Star Sampler (PSS), performs such a sampling via Hit-and-Run. We present an improved version, Stagger Thompson Sampler (STS). STS more precisely locates the maximizer than does TS using less computation time. We demonstrate that STS outperforms TS, PSS, and other acquisition methods in numerical experiments of optimizations of several test functions across a broad range of dimension. Additionally, since PSS was originally presented not as a standalone acquisition method but as an input to a batching algorithm called Minimal Terminal Variance (MTV), we also demon-strate that STS matches PSS performance when used as the input to MTV.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 1 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.

Builds on

0 of 1 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.