mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Guarding the Gate: ConceptGuard Battles Concept-Level Backdoors in Concept Bottleneck Models

arXiv 2411.16512 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2024cs.CR cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing complexity of AI models, especially in deep learning, has raised concerns about transparency and accountability, particularly in high-stakes applications like medical diagnostics, where opaque models can undermine trust. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to address these issues by providing clear, interpretable models. Among XAI techniques, Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) enhance transparency by using high-level semantic concepts. However, CBMs are vulnerable to concept-level backdoor attacks, which inject hidden triggers into these concepts, leading to undetectable anomalous behavior. To address this critical security gap, we introduce ConceptGuard, a novel defense framework specifically designed to protect CBMs from concept-level backdoor attacks. ConceptGuard employs a multi-stage approach, including concept clustering based on text distance measurements and a voting mechanism among classifiers trained on different concept subgroups, to isolate and mitigate potential triggers. Our contributions are threefold: (i) we present ConceptGuard as the first defense mechanism tailored for concept-level backdoor attacks in CBMs; (ii) we provide theoretical guarantees that ConceptGuard can effectively defend against such attacks within a certain trigger size threshold, ensuring robustness; and (iii) we demonstrate that ConceptGuard maintains the high performance and interpretability of CBMs, crucial for trustworthiness. Through comprehensive experiments and theoretical proofs, we show that ConceptGuard significantly enhances the security and trustworthiness of CBMs, paving the way for their secure deployment in critical applications.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2024.

Builds on

14 of 19 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  4. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  5. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 538
  6. 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 285
  7. 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 269
  8. 2022Concept Bottleneck Model with Additional Unsupervised Conceptscited by 79
  9. 2022Interactive Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 79
  10. 2021BACKDOORL: Backdoor Attack against Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  11. 2023Backdoor Attacks Against Deep Image Compression via Adaptive Frequency Triggercited by 40
  12. 2023Robust and Interpretable Medical Image Classifiers via Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 40
2 more
  1. 2023Label Poisoning is All You Needcited by 29
  2. 2024Towards Trustworthy AI: A Review of Ethical and Robust Large Language Modelscited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024CAT: Concept-level backdoor ATtacks for Concept Bottleneck Models
  2. 2025ConceptGuard: Neuro-Symbolic Safety Guardrails via Sparse Interpretable Jailbreak Concepts
  3. 2025ExplainableGuard: Interpretable Adversarial Defense for Large Language Models Using Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  4. 2026SingGuard-NSFA: Extensible Guardrails for Agentic AI via Generative Reasoning and Real-Time Classification
  5. 2026TraceGuard: Process-Guided Firewall against Reasoning Backdoors in Large Language Models
  6. 2023TextGuard: Provable Defense against Backdoor Attacks on Text Classification
  7. 2026Critical-CoT: A Robust Defense Framework against Reasoning-Level Backdoor Attacks in Large Language Models
  8. 2022Backdooring Explainable Machine Learning