mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Harnessing Scale and Physics: A Multi-Graph Neural Operator Framework for PDEs on Arbitrary Geometries

arXiv 2411.15178 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) underpin many scientific phenomena, yet traditional computational approaches often struggle with complex, nonlinear systems and irregular geometries. This paper introduces the AMG method, a Multi-Graph neural operator approach designed for efficiently solving PDEs on Arbitrary geometries. AMG leverages advanced graph-based techniques and dynamic attention mechanisms within a novel GraphFormer architecture, enabling precise management of diverse spatial domains and complex data interdependencies. By constructing multi-scale graphs to handle variable feature frequencies and a physics graph to encapsulate inherent physical properties, AMG significantly outperforms previous methods, which are typically limited to uniform grids. We present a comprehensive evaluation of AMG across six benchmarks, demonstrating its consistent superiority over existing state-of-the-art models. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of tailored graph neural operators in surmounting the challenges faced by conventional PDE solvers. Our code and datasets are available on https://github.com/lizhihao2022/AMG.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2024.

Builds on

25 of 45 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  5. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  6. 2020Point Transformercited by 1,462
  7. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
  8. 2021MetaFormer Is Actually What You Need for Visioncited by 523
  9. 2019Graph U-Netscited by 489
  10. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
  11. 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 333
  12. 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 321
13 more
  1. 2017Dynamic Edge-Conditioned Filters in Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphscited by 307
  2. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
  3. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
  4. 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 270
  5. 2021Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential Equationscited by 229
  6. 2023Solving High-Dimensional PDEs with Latent Spectral Modelscited by 84
  7. 2023Improved Operator Learning by Orthogonal Attentioncited by 58
  8. 2022Nonlocal Kernel Network (NKN): a Stable and Resolution-Independent Deep Neural Networkcited by 45
  9. 2023MgNO: Efficient Parameterization of Linear Operators via Multigridcited by 40
  10. 2022Neural Implicit Flow: a mesh-agnostic dimensionality reduction paradigm of spatio-temporal datacited by 37
  11. 2018Learning Dual Convolutional Neural Networks for Low-Level Visioncited by 35
  12. 2022MAgNet: Mesh Agnostic Neural PDE Solvercited by 28
  13. 2024M2NO: An Efficient Multi-Resolution Operator Framework for Dynamic Multi-Scale PDE Solverscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 9.

15 papers.

Sort: