Delegating Responsibilities to Intelligent Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Benefits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI systems increasingly operate with autonomy and adaptability, the traditional boundaries of moral responsibility in techno-social systems are being challenged. This paper explores the evolving discourse on the delegation of responsibilities to intelligent autonomous agents and the ethical implications of such practices. Synthesizing recent developments in AI ethics, including concepts of distributed responsibility and ethical AI by design, the paper proposes a functionalist perspective as a framework. This perspective views moral responsibility not as an individual trait but as a role within a socio-technical system, distributed among human and artificial agents. As an example of 'AI ethical by design,' we present Basti and Vitiello's implementation. They suggest that AI can act as artificial moral agents by learning ethical guidelines and using Deontic Higher-Order Logic to assess decisions ethically. Motivated by the possible speed and scale beyond human supervision and ethical implications, the paper argues for 'AI ethical by design', while acknowledging the distributed, shared, and dynamic nature of responsibility. This functionalist approach offers a practical framework for navigating the complexities of AI ethics in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.
Builds on
2 of 29 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.