mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Overcomplete Tensor Decomposition via Koszul-Young Flattenings

arXiv 2411.14344 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2024cs.DS cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by connections between algebraic complexity lower bounds and tensor decompositions, we investigate Koszul-Young flattenings, which are the main ingredient in recent lower bounds for matrix multiplication. Based on this tool we give a new algorithm for decomposing an n1 × n2 × n3 tensor as the sum of a minimal number of rank-1 terms, and certifying uniqueness of this decomposition. For n1 ≤ n2 ≤ n3 with n1 → ∞ and n3/n2 = O(1), our algorithm is guaranteed to succeed when the tensor rank is bounded by r ≤ (1-ε)(n2 + n3) for an arbitrary ε > 0, provided the tensor components are generically chosen. For any fixed ε, the runtime is polynomial in n3. When n2 = n3 = n, our condition on the rank gives a factor-of-2 improvement over the classical simultaneous diagonalization algorithm, which requires r ≤ n, and also improves on the recent algorithm of Koiran (2024) which requires r ≤ 4n/3. It also improves on the PhD thesis of Persu (2018) which solves rank detection for r ≤ 3n/2. We complement our upper bounds by showing limitations, in particular that no flattening of the style we consider can surpass rank n2 + n3. Furthermore, for n × n × n tensors, we show that an even more general class of degree-d polynomial flattenings cannot surpass rank Cn for a constant C = C(d). This suggests that for tensor decompositions, the case of generic components may be fundamentally harder than that of random components, where efficient decomposition is possible even in highly overcomplete settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2024.

Builds on

24 of 70 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Introduction to Tensor Decompositions and their Applications in Machine Learningcited by 46
  2. 2015Fast spectral algorithms from sum-of-squares proofs: tensor decomposition and planted sparse vectorscited by 38
  3. 2016Polynomial-time Tensor Decompositions with Sum-of-Squarescited by 22
  4. 2013Smoothed Analysis of Tensor Decompositionscited by 19
  5. 2019The Kikuchi Hierarchy and Tensor PCAcited by 15
  6. 2015Decomposing Overcomplete 3rd Order Tensors using Sum-of-Squares Algorithmscited by 10
  7. 2013Fourier PCA and Robust Tensor Decompositioncited by 8
  8. 2022A Robust Spectral Algorithm for Overcomplete Tensor Decompositioncited by 7
  9. 2020Learning sums of powers of low-degree polynomials in the non-degenerate casecited by 6
  10. 2022Average-Case Complexity of Tensor Decomposition for Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 6
  11. 2019Classical and Quantum Algorithms for Tensor Principal Component Analysiscited by 5
  12. 2022Fast algorithm for overcomplete order-3 tensor decompositioncited by 5
12 more
  1. 2015How to refute a random CSPcited by 3
  2. 2020Exact nuclear norm, completion and decomposition for random overcomplete tensors via degree-4 SOScited by 3
  3. 2021Algorithms and Certificates for Boolean CSP Refutation: "Smoothed is no harder than Random"cited by 3
  4. 2020Overcomplete order-3 tensor decomposition, blind deconvolution and Gaussian mixture modelscited by 2
  5. 2020Efficient Tensor Decompositioncited by 2
  6. 2022A simple and sharper proof of the hypergraph Moore boundcited by 2
  7. 2022Complete Decomposition of Symmetric Tensors in Linear Time and Polylogarithmic Precisioncited by 2
  8. 2022Computing linear sections of varieties: quantum entanglement, tensor decompositions and beyondcited by 2
  9. 2024An efficient uniqueness theorem for overcomplete tensor decompositioncited by 2
  10. 2024On the uniqueness and computation of commuting extensionscited by 1
  11. 2024New Tools for Smoothed Analysis: Least Singular Value Bounds for Random Matrices with Dependent Entriescited by 1
  12. 2024X-arability of mixed quantum statescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.