mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Utilizing Large Language Models to Synthesize Product Desirability Datasets

arXiv 2411.13485 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This research explores the application of large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic datasets for Product Desirability Toolkit (PDT) testing, a key component in evaluating user sentiment and product experience. Utilizing gpt-4o-mini, a cost-effective alternative to larger commercial LLMs, three methods, Word+Review, Review+Word, and Supply-Word, were each used to synthesize 1000 product reviews. The generated datasets were assessed for sentiment alignment, textual diversity, and data generation cost. Results demonstrated high sentiment alignment across all methods, with Pearson correlations ranging from 0.93 to 0.97. Supply-Word exhibited the highest diversity and coverage of PDT terms, although with increased generation costs. Despite minor biases toward positive sentiments, in situations with limited test data, LLM-generated synthetic data offers significant advantages, including scalability, cost savings, and flexibility in dataset production.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2024.

Builds on

8 of 48 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
  2. 2019Green AIcited by 627
  3. 2021Generating Datasets with Pretrained Language Modelscited by 193
  4. 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 175
  5. 2018Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis : A Surveycited by 139
  6. 2024Standardizing the Measurement of Text Diversity: A Tool and a Comparative Analysis of Scorescited by 50
  7. 2024Synthesize Step-by-Step: Tools, Templates and LLMs as Data Generators for Reasoning-Based Chart VQAcited by 19
  8. 2024Using LLMs to Establish Implicit User Sentiment of Software Desirabilitycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.