mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparing Prior and Learned Time Representations in Transformer Models of Timeseries

arXiv 2411.12476 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

What sets timeseries analysis apart from other machine learning exercises is that time representation becomes a primary aspect of the experiment setup, as it must adequately represent the temporal relations that are relevant for the application at hand. In the work described here we study wo different variations of the Transformer architecture: one where we use the fixed time representation proposed in the literature and one where the time representation is learned from the data. Our experiments use data from predicting the energy output of solar panels, a task that exhibits known periodicities (daily and seasonal) that is straight-forward to encode in the fixed time representation. Our results indicate that even in an experiment where the phenomenon is well-understood, it is difficult to encode prior knowledge due to side-effects that are difficult to mitigate. We conclude that research work is needed to work the human into the learning loop in ways that improve the robustness and trust-worthiness of the network.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2024.

Builds on

5 of 7 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 554
  2. 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 497
  3. 2021Multi-Time Attention Networks for Irregularly Sampled Time Seriescited by 238
  4. 2021Modeling Irregular Time Series with Continuous Recurrent Unitscited by 103
  5. 2016Phased LSTM: Accelerating Recurrent Network Training for Long or Event-based Sequencescited by 99

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.