mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Neural and Time-Series Approaches for Pricing Weather Derivatives: Performance and Regime Adaptation Using Satellite Data

arXiv 2411.12013 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2024q-fin.MF cs.LG q-fin.STcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper studies pricing of weather-derivative (WD) contracts on temperature and precipitation. For temperature-linked strangles in Toronto and Chicago, we benchmark a harmonic-regression/ARMA model against a feed-forward neural network (NN), finding that the NN reduces out-of-sample mean-squared error (MSE) and materially shifts December fair values relative to both the time-series model and the industry-standard Historic Burn Approach (HBA). For precipitation, we employ a compound Poisson--Gamma framework: shape and scale parameters are estimated via maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and via a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained on 30-day rainfall sequences spanning multiple seasons. The CNN adaptively learns season-specific (α,β) mappings, thereby capturing heterogeneity across regimes that static i.i.d. fits miss. At valuation, we assume days are i.i.d. Gamma(hatα,hatβ) within each regime and apply a mean-count approximation (replacing the Poisson count by its mean (nhatλ) to derive closed-form strangle prices. Exploratory analysis of 1981--2023 NASA POWER data confirms pronounced seasonal heterogeneity in (α,β) between summer and winter, demonstrating that static global fits are inadequate. Back-testing on Toronto and Chicago grids shows that our regime-adaptive CNN yields competitive valuations and underscores how model choice can shift strangle prices. Payoffs are evaluated analytically when possible and by simulation elsewhere, enabling a like-for-like comparison of forecasting and valuation methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2024.

Builds on

3 of 14 references.

References · 3

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,991
  2. 2023Foundation Models for Weather and Climate Data Understanding: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 32
  3. 2024Interpretable Machine Learning for Weather and Climate Prediction: A Surveycited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.