mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Sample-optimal Learning of Gaussian Tree Models via Sample-optimal Testing of Gaussian Mutual Information

arXiv 2411.11516 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.DS stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning high-dimensional distributions is a significant challenge in machine learning and statistics. Classical research has mostly concentrated on asymptotic analysis of such data under suitable assumptions. While existing works [Bhattacharyya et al.: SICOMP 2023, Daskalakis et al.: STOC 2021, Choo et al.: ALT 2024] focus on discrete distributions, the current work addresses the tree structure learning problem for Gaussian distributions, providing efficient algorithms with solid theoretical guarantees. This is crucial as real-world distributions are often continuous and differ from the discrete scenarios studied in prior works. In this work, we design a conditional mutual information tester for Gaussian random variables that can test whether two Gaussian random variables are independent, or their conditional mutual information is at least varepsilon, for some parameter varepsilon ∈ (0,1) using O(varepsilon-1) samples which we show to be near-optimal. In contrast, an additive estimation would require Omega(varepsilon-2) samples. Our upper bound technique uses linear regression on a pair of suitably transformed random variables. Importantly, we show that the chain rule of conditional mutual information continues to hold for the estimated (conditional) mutual information. As an application of such a mutual information tester, we give an efficient varepsilon-approximate structure-learning algorithm for an n-variate Gaussian tree model that takes widetildeTheta(nvarepsilon-1) samples which we again show to be near-optimal. In contrast, when the underlying Gaussian model is not known to be tree-structured, we show that widetildeTheta(n2varepsilon-2) samples are necessary and sufficient to output an varepsilon-approximate tree structure. We perform extensive experiments that corroborate our theoretical convergence bounds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2024.

Builds on

21 of 54 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Efficiently learning Ising models on arbitrary graphscited by 50
  2. 2017Learning Graphical Models Using Multiplicative Weightscited by 43
  3. 2015Optimal Testing for Properties of Distributionscited by 36
  4. 2016Testing Bayesian Networkscited by 23
  5. 2021Local permutation tests for conditional independencecited by 23
  6. 2017Testing Conditional Independence of Discrete Distributionscited by 22
  7. 2021On the Properties of Kullback-Leibler Divergence Between Multivariate Gaussian Distributionscited by 22
  8. 2019Learning Some Popular Gaussian Graphical Models without Condition Number Boundscited by 20
  9. 2020Optimal Testing of Discrete Distributions with High Probabilitycited by 15
  10. 2016Learning a Tree-Structured Ising Model in Order to Make Predictionscited by 14
  11. 2023A Unified Approach to Learning Ising Models: Beyond Independence and Bounded Widthcited by 13
  12. 2019Testing Conditional Independence on Discrete Data using Stochastic Complexitycited by 10
9 more
  1. 2021Chow-Liu++: Optimal Prediction-Centric Learning of Tree Ising Modelscited by 9
  2. 2013Maximum Likelihood Bounded Tree-Width Markov Networkscited by 7
  3. 2022Learning and Testing Latent-Tree Ising Models Efficientlycited by 7
  4. 2022Independence Testing for Bounded Degree Bayesian Networkcited by 5
  5. 2023Learning bounded-degree polytrees with known skeletoncited by 5
  6. 2023Conditional Independence Testing for Discrete Distributions: Beyond chi2- and G-testscited by 3
  7. 2024Optimal estimation of Gaussian (poly)treescited by 3
  8. 2021Learning Sparse Fixed-Structure Gaussian Bayesian Networkscited by 2
  9. 2021Bayesian learning of forest and tree graphical modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.