mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AnomalyAID: Reliable Interpretation for Semi-supervised Network Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2411.11293 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semi-supervised Learning plays a crucial role in network anomaly detection applications, however, learning anomaly patterns with limited labeled samples is not easy. Additionally, the lack of interpretability creates key barriers to the adoption of semi-supervised frameworks in practice. Most existing interpretation methods are developed for supervised/unsupervised frameworks or non-security domains and fail to provide reliable interpretations. In this paper, we propose AnomalyAID, a general framework aiming to (1) make the anomaly detection process interpretable and improve the reliability of interpretation results, and (2) assign high-confidence pseudo labels to unlabeled samples for improving the performance of anomaly detection systems with limited supervised data. For (1), we propose a novel interpretation approach that leverages global and local interpreters to provide reliable explanations, while for (2), we design a new two-stage semi-supervised learning framework for network anomaly detection by aligning both stages' model predictions with special constraints. We apply AnomalyAID over two representative network anomaly detection tasks and extensively evaluate AnomalyAID with representative prior works. Experimental results demonstrate that AnomalyAID can provide accurate detection results with reliable interpretations for semi-supervised network anomaly detection systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2024.

Builds on

25 of 43 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  5. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  6. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  7. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  8. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  9. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  10. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
  11. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
  12. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
13 more
  1. 2017Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysiscited by 166
  2. 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 165
  3. 2018Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 121
  4. 2019Multi-Stage Self-Supervised Learning for Graph Convolutional Networks on Graphs with Few Labelscited by 111
  5. 2019Evaluating Explanation Methods for Deep Learning in Securitycited by 38
  6. 2019Can I Trust the Explainer? Verifying Post-hoc Explanatory Methodscited by 37
  7. 2019From Clustering to Cluster Explanations via Neural Networkscited by 34
  8. 2020Can We Trust Your Explanations? Sanity Checks for Interpreters in Android Malware Analysiscited by 20
  9. 2023Semi-supervised learning made simple with self-supervised clusteringcited by 20
  10. 2017Contextual Outlier Interpretationcited by 19
  11. 2021DeepAID: Interpreting and Improving Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Security Applicationscited by 18
  12. 2022SoK: The Impact of Unlabelled Data in Cyberthreat Detectioncited by 15
  13. 2023InstanT: Semi-supervised Learning with Instance-dependent Thresholdscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.