mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On-device Anomaly Detection in Conveyor Belt Operations

arXiv 2411.10729 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.CE eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conveyor belts are crucial in mining operations by enabling the continuous and efficient movement of bulk materials over long distances, which directly impacts productivity. While detecting anomalies in specific conveyor belt components has been widely studied, identifying the root causes of these failures, such as changing production conditions and operator errors, remains critical. Continuous monitoring of mining conveyor belt work cycles is still at an early stage and requires robust solutions. Recently, an anomaly detection method for duty cycle operations of a mining conveyor belt has been proposed. Based on its limited performance and unevaluated long-term proper operation, this study proposes two novel methods for classifying normal and abnormal duty cycles. The proposed approaches are pattern recognition systems that make use of threshold-based duty-cycle detection mechanisms, manually extracted features, pattern-matching, and supervised tiny machine learning models. The explored low-computational models include decision tree, random forest, extra trees, extreme gradient boosting, Gaussian naive Bayes, and multi-layer perceptron. A comprehensive evaluation of the former and proposed approaches is carried out on two datasets. Both proposed methods outperform the former method in anomaly detection, with the best-performing approach being dataset-dependent. The heuristic rule-based approach achieves the highest F1-score in the same dataset used for algorithm training, with 97.3% for normal cycles and 80.2% for abnormal cycles. The ML-based approach performs better on a dataset including the effects of machine aging, with an F1-score scoring 91.3% for normal cycles and 67.9% for abnormal cycles. Implemented on two low-power microcontrollers, the methods demonstrate efficient, real-time operation with energy consumption of 13.3 and 20.6 textmu J during inference. These results ...

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2024.

Builds on

4 of 38 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2021Sound Event Detection: A Tutorialcited by 51
  3. 2023A Machine Learning-oriented Survey on Tiny Machine Learningcited by 27
  4. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Transfer Learning for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Time Series: Methods, Applications, and Directionscited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.