mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Compatibility of Generative AI and Generative Linguistics

arXiv 2411.10533 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In mid-20th century, the linguist Noam Chomsky established generative linguistics, and made significant contributions to linguistics, computer science, and cognitive science by developing the computational and philosophical foundations for a theory that defined language as a formal system, instantiated in human minds or artificial machines. These developments in turn ushered a wave of research on symbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI). More recently, a new wave of non-symbolic AI has emerged with neural Language Models (LMs) that exhibit impressive linguistic performance, leading many to question the older approach and wonder about the the compatibility of generative AI and generative linguistics. In this paper, we argue that generative AI is compatible with generative linguistics and reinforces its basic tenets in at least three ways. First, we argue that LMs are formal generative models as intended originally in Chomsky's work on formal language theory. Second, LMs can help develop a program for discovery procedures as defined by Chomsky's "Syntactic Structures". Third, LMs can be a major asset for Chomsky's minimalist approach to Universal Grammar and language acquisition. In turn, generative linguistics can provide the foundation for evaluating and improving LMs as well as other generative computational models of language.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2024.

Builds on

16 of 91 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  3. 2022Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchycited by 217
  4. 2019Compound Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars for Grammar Inductioncited by 76
  5. 2023Language models are not naysayers: An analysis of language models on negation benchmarkscited by 74
  6. 2019Unsupervised Latent Tree Induction with Deep Inside-Outside Recursive Autoencoderscited by 60
  7. 2019Visually Grounded Neural Syntax Acquisitioncited by 48
  8. 2021On the proper role of linguistically-oriented deep net analysis in linguistic theorizingcited by 43
  9. 2020Visually Grounded Compound PCFGscited by 34
  10. 2021Minimum Description Length Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 24
  11. 2023Large Language Models: The Need for Nuance in Current Debates and a Pragmatic Perspective on Understandingcited by 20
  12. 2020The Return of Lexical Dependencies: Neural Lexicalized PCFGscited by 19
4 more
  1. 2023Mathematical Structure of Syntactic Mergecited by 17
  2. 2023Why Linguistics Will Thrive in the 21st Century: A Reply to Piantadosi (2023)cited by 9
  3. 2018A case for deep learning in semanticscited by 2
  4. 2024Reframing linguistic bootstrapping as joint inference using visually-grounded grammar induction modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.