mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ghost-Connect Net: A Generalization-Enhanced Guidance For Sparse Deep Networks Under Distribution Shifts

arXiv 2411.09199 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse deep neural networks (DNNs) excel in real-world applications like robotics and computer vision, by reducing computational demands that hinder usability. However, recent studies aim to boost DNN efficiency by trimming redundant neurons or filters based on task relevance, but neglect their adaptability to distribution shifts. We aim to enhance these existing techniques by introducing a companion network, Ghost Connect-Net (GC-Net), to monitor the connections in the original network with distribution generalization advantage. GC-Net's weights represent connectivity measurements between consecutive layers of the original network. After pruning GC-Net, the pruned locations are mapped back to the original network as pruned connections, allowing for the combination of magnitude and connectivity-based pruning methods. Experimental results using common DNN benchmarks, such as CIFAR-10, Fashion MNIST, and Tiny ImageNet show promising results for hybridizing the method, and using GC-Net guidance for later layers of a network and direct pruning on earlier layers. We provide theoretical foundations for GC-Net's approach to improving generalization under distribution shifts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.

Builds on

28 of 38 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  4. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  5. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  6. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
  7. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
  8. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  9. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
  10. 2016Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 541
  11. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 479
  12. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
16 more
  1. 2019GhostNet: More Features from Cheap Operationscited by 410
  2. 2023DepGraph: Towards Any Structural Pruningcited by 203
  3. 2020Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?cited by 182
  4. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 171
  5. 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 159
  6. 2020Layer-adaptive sparsity for the Magnitude-based Pruningcited by 126
  7. 2020A Unified View of Label Shift Estimationcited by 119
  8. 2021Do We Actually Need Dense Over-Parameterization? In-Time Over-Parameterization in Sparse Trainingcited by 110
  9. 2019Neural Machine Translation: A Review and Surveycited by 100
  10. 2020Neural Pruning via Growing Regularizationcited by 97
  11. 2020EagleEye: Fast Sub-net Evaluation for Efficient Neural Network Pruningcited by 80
  12. 2021A Winning Hand: Compressing Deep Networks Can Improve Out-Of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 62
  13. 2021The Elastic Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 23
  14. 2017MIT Advanced Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Naturalistic Driving Study of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automationcited by 15
  15. 2017DeepPicar: A Low-cost Deep Neural Network-based Autonomous Carcited by 11
  16. 2022Theoretical Understanding of the Information Flow on Continual Learning Performancecited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.