Computational metaoptics for imaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Metasurfaces -- ultrathin structures composed of subwavelength optical elements -- have revolutionized light manipulation by enabling precise control over electromagnetic waves' amplitude, phase, polarization, and spectral properties. Concurrently, computational imaging leverages algorithms to reconstruct images from optically processed signals, overcoming limitations of traditional imaging systems. This review explores the synergistic integration of metaoptics and computational imaging, "computational metaoptics," which combines the physical wavefront shaping ability of metasurfaces with advanced computational algorithms to enhance imaging performance beyond conventional limits. We discuss how computational metaoptics addresses the inherent limitations of single-layer metasurfaces in achieving multifunctionality without compromising efficiency. By treating metasurfaces as physical preconditioners and co-designing them with reconstruction algorithms through end-to-end (inverse) design, it is possible to jointly optimize the optical hardware and computational software. This holistic approach allows for the automatic discovery of optimal metasurface designs and reconstruction methods that significantly improve imaging capabilities. Advanced applications enabled by computational metaoptics are highlighted, including phase imaging and quantum state measurement, which benefit from the metasurfaces' ability to manipulate complex light fields and the computational algorithms' capacity to reconstruct high-dimensional information. We also examine performance evaluation challenges, emphasizing the need for new metrics that account for the combined optical and computational nature of these systems. Finally, we identify new frontiers in computational metaoptics which point toward a future where computational metaoptics may play a central role in advancing imaging science and technology.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.
Builds on
21 of 120 references.
References · 21
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2021Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LMcited by 621
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
- 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
- 2023Challenges and Applications of Large Language Modelscited by 251
- 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 233
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
- 2018All-Optical Machine Learning Using Diffractive Deep Neural Networkscited by 175
- 2021Gradient Descent on Two-layer Nets: Margin Maximization and Simplicity Biascited by 82
- 2022Experimentally realized in situ backpropagation for deep learning in nanophotonic neural networkscited by 43
- 2020Non-line-of-sight Imagingcited by 41
9 more
- 2018An Optical Frontend for a Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 18
- 2022Meta-optic Accelerators for Object Classifierscited by 13
- 2023Spatially Varying Nanophotonic Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2024End-to-End Hybrid Refractive-Diffractive Lens Design with Differentiable Ray-Wave Modelcited by 11
- 2023Photonic Advantage of Optical Encoderscited by 8
- 2021End-to-end metasurface inverse design for single-shot multi-channel imagingcited by 5
- 2020Dynamic brain spectrum acquired by a real-time ultra-spectral imaging chip with reconfigurable metasurfacescited by 4
- 2022End-to-End Optimization of Metasurfaces for Imaging with Compressed Sensingcited by 4
- 2021Gradient descent globally solves average-case non-resonant physical design problemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.