Enhancing Lie Detection Accuracy: A Comparative Study of Classic ML, CNN, and GCN Models using Audio-Visual Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Inaccuracies in polygraph tests often lead to wrongful convictions, false information, and bias, all of which have significant consequences for both legal and political systems. Recently, analyzing facial micro-expressions has emerged as a method for detecting deception; however, current models have not reached high accuracy and generalizability. The purpose of this study is to aid in remedying these problems. The unique multimodal transformer architecture used in this study improves upon previous approaches by using auditory inputs, visual facial micro-expressions, and manually transcribed gesture annotations, moving closer to a reliable non-invasive lie detection model. Visual and auditory features were extracted using the Vision Transformer and OpenSmile models respectively, which were then concatenated with the transcriptions of participants micro-expressions and gestures. Various models were trained for the classification of lies and truths using these processed and concatenated features. The CNN Conv1D multimodal model achieved an average accuracy of 95.4%. However, further research is still required to create higher-quality datasets and even more generalized models for more diverse applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2024.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2021WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processingcited by 1,609
- 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 483
- 2021Deep Learning for Micro-expression Recognition: A Surveycited by 43
- 2019Spontaneous Facial Micro-Expression Recognition using 3D Spatiotemporal Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2018Face-Focused Cross-Stream Network for Deception Detection in Videoscited by 14
- 2023Audio-Visual Deception Detection: DOLOS Dataset and Parameter-Efficient Crossmodal Learningcited by 14
- 2018A Review on Facial Micro-Expressions Analysis: Datasets, Features and Metricscited by 9
- 2019The politics of deceptive borders: 'biomarkers of deceit' and the case of iBorderCtrlcited by 4
- 2022Can lies be faked? Comparing low-stakes and high-stakes deception video datasets from a Machine Learning perspectivecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.