mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Perspective Stance Detection

arXiv 2411.08752 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Subjective NLP tasks usually rely on human annotations provided by multiple annotators, whose judgments may vary due to their diverse backgrounds and life experiences. Traditional methods often aggregate multiple annotations into a single ground truth, disregarding the diversity in perspectives that arises from annotator disagreement. In this preliminary study, we examine the effect of including multiple annotations on model accuracy in classification. Our methodology investigates the performance of perspective-aware classification models in stance detection task and further inspects if annotator disagreement affects the model confidence. The results show that multi-perspective approach yields better classification performance outperforming the baseline which uses the single label. This entails that designing more inclusive perspective-aware AI models is not only an essential first step in implementing responsible and ethical AI, but it can also achieve superior results than using the traditional approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2024.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  2. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  3. 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 140
  4. 2023Capturing Perspectives of Crowdsourced Annotators in Subjective Learning Taskscited by 28
  5. 2022Evaluation Metrics for Measuring Bias in Search Engine Resultscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.