Diagnosing Neural Convergence with Topological Alignment Spectra
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Representational similarity in neural networks is inherently scale-dependent, yet widely used metrics such as Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) and Procrustes analysis provide only global scalar estimates. These scalars often fail to distinguish micro-scale geometric jitter (local noise) from macro-scale semantic reorganization, compressing multi-scale structural relationships into a single uninformative value. We introduce the Topological Alignment Spectrum (TAS), a multi-scale diagnostic tool that sweeps normalized mean Jaccard similarity over varying neighborhood sizes. By normalizing the metric over an analytically-derived expected range (from expected overlap under randomness to perfect alignment), TAS yields a dimension-invariant metric over a spectrum of scales, where one indicates perfect structural alignment, zero reflects chance-level agreement, and negative values signal active anti-alignment at specific scales. Experiments on synthetic point clouds demonstrate that TAS allows the recognition of distinct types of alignment perturbation: local jitter harms fine-grained neighborhoods but preserves cluster-level structure, while cluster-center shuffling preserves local similarity but disrupts global alignment -- phenomena that remain invisible or conflated under global, single-scalar metrics. Applying TAS to the MultiBERTs collection reveals that fine-tuning induces comprehensive topological reorganization across scales, challenging the view of task adaptation as merely conservative or localized. While models from different random seeds remain locally divergent, semantic clusters emerge as the dominant scale of alignment. TAS thus offers a granular, topology-aware alternative for diagnosing convergence and representational stability in deep networks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2024.
Builds on
16 of 23 references.
References · 16
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
- 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 131
- 2020What Happens To BERT Embeddings During Fine-tuning?cited by 113
- 2021The MultiBERTs: BERT Reproductions for Robustness Analysiscited by 92
- 2021Representation Topology Divergence: A Method for Comparing Neural Network Representationscited by 66
- 2021A Closer Look at How Fine-tuning Changes BERTcited by 42
- 2022Beyond Supervised vs. Unsupervised: Representative Benchmarking and Analysis of Image Representation Learningcited by 20
4 more
- 2022GULP: a prediction-based metric between representationscited by 17
- 2020Inter-layer Information Similarity Assessment of Deep Neural Networks Via Topological Similarity and Persistence Analysis of Data Neighbour Dynamicscited by 7
- 2024Quantifying Prediction Consistency Under Fine-Tuning Multiplicity in Tabular LLMscited by 6
- 2023ContraSim -- Analyzing Neural Representations Based on Contrastive Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.