New Emerged Security and Privacy of Pre-trained Model: a Survey and Outlook
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Thanks to the explosive growth of data and the development of computational resources, it is possible to build pre-trained models that can achieve outstanding performance on various tasks, such as neural language processing, computer vision, and more. Despite their powerful capabilities, pre-trained models have also sparked attention to the emerging security challenges associated with their real-world applications. Security and privacy issues, such as leaking privacy information and generating harmful responses, have seriously undermined users' confidence in these powerful models. Concerns are growing as model performance improves dramatically. Researchers are eager to explore the unique security and privacy issues that have emerged, their distinguishing factors, and how to defend against them. However, the current literature lacks a clear taxonomy of emerging attacks and defenses for pre-trained models, which hinders a high-level and comprehensive understanding of these questions. To fill the gap, we conduct a systematical survey on the security risks of pre-trained models, proposing a taxonomy of attack and defense methods based on the accessibility of pre-trained models' input and weights in various security test scenarios. This taxonomy categorizes attacks and defenses into No-Change, Input-Change, and Model-Change approaches. With the taxonomy analysis, we capture the unique security and privacy issues of pre-trained models, categorizing and summarizing existing security issues based on their characteristics. In addition, we offer a timely and comprehensive review of each category's strengths and limitations. Our survey concludes by highlighting potential new research opportunities in the security and privacy of pre-trained models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 91 of its 123 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.
Builds on
91 of 123 references.
References · 91
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
38 more
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2023Video-LLaMA: An Instruction-tuned Audio-Visual Language Model for Video Understandingcited by 1,471
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
- 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 745
- 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
- 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 535
- 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Studycited by 498
- 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 491
- 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generationcited by 451
- 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Ciphercited by 423
- 2022A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real Worldcited by 356
- 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 333
- 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 328
- 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 297
- 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 285
- 2023Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Modelscited by 273
- 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 269
- 2022Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?cited by 200
- 2023Transformer-Patcher: One Mistake worth One Neuroncited by 197
- 2022Patching open-vocabulary models by interpolating weightscited by 190
- 2023MasterKey: Automated Jailbreak Across Multiple Large Language Model Chatbotscited by 183
- 2023MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teamingcited by 163
- 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 159
- 2018SentiNet: Detecting Localized Universal Attacks Against Deep Learning Systemscited by 152
- 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 145
50 most cited of 91 All 91 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.