Semantic Sleuth: Identifying Ponzi Contracts via Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Smart contracts, self-executing agreements directly encoded in code, are fundamental to blockchain technology, especially in decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3. However, the rise of Ponzi schemes in smart contracts poses significant risks, leading to substantial financial losses and eroding trust in blockchain systems. Existing detection methods, such as PonziGuard, depend on large amounts of labeled data and struggle to identify unseen Ponzi schemes, limiting their reliability and generalizability. In contrast, we introduce PonziSleuth, the first LLM-driven approach for detecting Ponzi smart contracts, which requires no labeled training data. PonziSleuth utilizes advanced language understanding capabilities of LLMs to analyze smart contract source code through a novel two-step zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting technique. Our extensive evaluation on benchmark datasets and real-world contracts demonstrates that PonziSleuth delivers comparable, and often superior, performance without the extensive data requirements, achieving a balanced detection accuracy of 96.06% with GPT-3.5-turbo, 93.91% with LLAMA3, and 94.27% with Mistral. In real-world detection, PonziSleuth successfully identified 15 new Ponzi schemes from 4,597 contracts verified by Etherscan in March 2024, with a false negative rate of 0% and a false positive rate of 0.29%. These results highlight PonziSleuth's capability to detect diverse and novel Ponzi schemes, marking a significant advancement in leveraging LLMs for enhancing blockchain security and mitigating financial scams.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 7.
7 papers.
- 2025Reflections on the Reproducibility of Commercial LLM Performance in Empirical Software Engineering Studiescited by 12
- 2025SlimCaching: Edge Caching of Mixture-of-Experts for Distributed Inferencecited by 7
- 2025Rethinking Membership Inference Attacks Against Transfer Learningcited by 5
- 2025PartialLoading: User Scheduling and Bandwidth Allocation for Parameter-sharing Edge Inferencecited by 4
- 2025Secure Resource Allocation via Constrained Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025DMind Benchmark: Toward a Holistic Assessment of LLM Capabilities across the Web3 Domaincited by 1
- 2025CASPER: Contrastive Approach for Smart Ponzi Scheme Detecter with More Negative Samplescited by 0
- 2025Reflections on the Reproducibility of Commercial LLM Performance in Empirical Software Engineering Studies29 Oct 2025
- 2025CASPER: Contrastive Approach for Smart Ponzi Scheme Detecter with More Negative Samples19 Jul 2025
- 2025SlimCaching: Edge Caching of Mixture-of-Experts for Distributed Inference9 Jul 2025
- 2025DMind Benchmark: Toward a Holistic Assessment of LLM Capabilities across the Web3 Domain18 Apr 2025
- 2025PartialLoading: User Scheduling and Bandwidth Allocation for Parameter-sharing Edge Inference29 Mar 2025
- 2025Rethinking Membership Inference Attacks Against Transfer Learning20 Jan 2025
- 2025Secure Resource Allocation via Constrained Deep Reinforcement Learning20 Jan 2025