mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Balancing Power and Ethics: A Framework for Addressing Human Rights Concerns in Military AI

arXiv 2411.06336 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.CEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI has made significant strides recently, leading to various applications in both civilian and military sectors. The military sees AI as a solution for developing more effective and faster technologies. While AI offers benefits like improved operational efficiency and precision targeting, it also raises serious ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding human rights violations. Autonomous weapons that make decisions without human input can threaten the right to life and violate international humanitarian law. To address these issues, we propose a three-stage framework (Design, In Deployment, and During/After Use) for evaluating human rights concerns in the design, deployment, and use of military AI. Each phase includes multiple components that address various concerns specific to that phase, ranging from bias and regulatory issues to violations of International Humanitarian Law. By this framework, we aim to balance the advantages of AI in military operations with the need to protect human rights.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2024.

Builds on

1 of 18 references.

References · 1

  1. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384

Built on by

Not cited yet.