Detecting Reference Errors in Scientific Literature with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reference errors, such as citation and quotation errors, are common in scientific papers. Such errors can result in the propagation of inaccurate information, but are difficult and time-consuming to detect, posing a significant challenge to scientific publishing. To support automatic detection of reference errors, this work evaluated the ability of large language models in OpenAI's GPT family to detect quotation errors. Specifically, we prepared an expert-annotated, general-domain dataset of statement-reference pairs from journal articles. Large language models were evaluated in different settings with varying amounts of reference information provided by retrieval augmentation. Our results showed that large language models are able to detect erroneous citations with limited context and without fine-tuning. This study contributes to the growing literature that seeks to utilize artificial intelligence to assist in the writing, reviewing, and publishing of scientific papers. Potential avenues for further improvements in this task are also discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2024.
Builds on
7 of 34 references.
References · 7
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2020Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claimscited by 546
- 2020Scientific Claim Verification with VERT5ERINIcited by 47
- 2020A Paragraph-level Multi-task Learning Model for Scientific Fact-Verificationcited by 29
- 2024How well do LLMs cite relevant medical references? An evaluation framework and analysescited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluationcited by 12
- 2026BibAgent: An Agentic Framework for Traceable Miscitation Detection in Scientific Literaturecited by 9
- 2025To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysiscited by 5
- 2026Detection and Interpretability Analysis of Quotation Errors by Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Detection and Interpretability Analysis of Quotation Errors by Large Language Models7 Jun 2026
- 2026BibAgent: An Agentic Framework for Traceable Miscitation Detection in Scientific Literature12 Jan 2026
- 2025To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysis5 Dec 2025
- 2025Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluation28 May 2025