Stepping Forward on the Last Mile
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Continuously adapting pre-trained models to local data on resource constrained edge devices is the last mile for model deployment. However, as models increase in size and depth, backpropagation requires a large amount of memory, which becomes prohibitive for edge devices. In addition, most existing low power neural processing engines (e.g., NPUs, DSPs, MCUs, etc.) are designed as fixed-point inference accelerators, without training capabilities. Forward gradients, solely based on directional derivatives computed from two forward calls, have been recently used for model training, with substantial savings in computation and memory. However, the performance of quantized training with fixed-point forward gradients remains unclear. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of on-device training using fixed-point forward gradients, by conducting comprehensive experiments across a variety of deep learning benchmark tasks in both vision and audio domains. We propose a series of algorithm enhancements that further reduce the memory footprint, and the accuracy gap compared to backpropagation. An empirical study on how training with forward gradients navigates in the loss landscape is further explored. Our results demonstrate that on the last mile of model customization on edge devices, training with fixed-point forward gradients is a feasible and practical approach.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.
Builds on
33 of 39 references.
References · 33
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
- 2021AST: Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 643
21 more
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 571
- 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 472
- 2018Meta-Learning for Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Classificationcited by 456
- 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 397
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passescited by 345
- 2018Few-Shot Learning via Embedding Adaptation with Set-to-Set Functionscited by 294
- 2019SimpleShot: Revisiting Nearest-Neighbor Classification for Few-Shot Learningcited by 195
- 2019Parameter Efficient Training of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks by Dynamic Sparse Reparameterizationcited by 189
- 2020A Primer on Zeroth-Order Optimization in Signal Processing and Machine Learningcited by 162
- 2022On-Device Training Under 256KB Memorycited by 160
- 2023DeepZero: Scaling up Zeroth-Order Optimization for Deep Model Trainingcited by 76
- 2022Gradients without Backpropagationcited by 73
- 2022Scaling Forward Gradient With Local Lossescited by 65
- 2019On-Device Machine Learning: An Algorithms and Learning Theory Perspectivecited by 63
- 2023Can Forward Gradient Match Backpropagation?cited by 26
- 2022MetaAudio: A Few-Shot Audio Classification Benchmarkcited by 24
- 2019Learning Sound Event Classifiers from Web Audio with Noisy Labelscited by 22
- 2016Convolutional RNN: an Enhanced Model for Extracting Features from Sequential Datacited by 17
- 2015A Theory of Local Learning, the Learning Channel, and the Optimality of Backpropagationcited by 11
- 2022Optimization without Backpropagationcited by 11
- 2022A New Frontier of AI: On-Device AI Training and Personalizationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Fine-tuning Quantized Neural Networks with Zeroth-order Optimizationcited by 6
- 2026Quantized Evolution Strategies: High-precision Fine-tuning of Quantized LLMs at Low-precision Costcited by 6
- 2026Compander-Aligned Query Geometry for Quantized Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026QScheduler: Adaptive Gradient Sampling for Zeroth-Order On-Device Training on INT8 NPUscited by 0
- 2026QScheduler: Adaptive Gradient Sampling for Zeroth-Order On-Device Training on INT8 NPUs21 Jul 2026
- 2026Compander-Aligned Query Geometry for Quantized Zeroth-Order Optimization11 May 2026
- 2026Quantized Evolution Strategies: High-precision Fine-tuning of Quantized LLMs at Low-precision Cost3 Feb 2026
- 2025Fine-tuning Quantized Neural Networks with Zeroth-order Optimization19 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FF-INT8: Efficient Forward-Forward DNN Training on Edge Devices with INT8 Precision
- 2024Poor Man's Training on MCUs: A Memory-Efficient Quantized Back-Propagation-Free Approach
- 2026A Comparative Study of CNN Optimization Methods for Edge AI: Exploring the Role of Early Exits
- 2026Synthetic Benchmarks Overstate Forward-Forward Scaling: Real-Data Limits of Layer-Local Training
- 2021Enabling Binary Neural Network Training on the Edge
- 2026Gradient Under Microscope: Benchmarking Resource Utilization of Memory-Efficient Gradient Computation Methods
- 20213U-EdgeAI: Ultra-Low Memory Training, Ultra-Low BitwidthQuantization, and Ultra-Low Latency Acceleration
- 2026RAMP: Robust Adaptive Mixed-Precision Quantization for Edge CPU Vision Models