mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine Grained Insider Risk Detection

arXiv 2411.02645 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2024cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a method to detect departures from business-justified workflows among support agents. Our goal is to assist auditors in identifying agent actions that cannot be explained by the activity within their surrounding context, where normal activity patterns are established from historical data. We apply our method to help audit millions of actions of over three thousand support agents. We collect logs from the tools used by support agents and construct a bipartite graph of Actions and Entities representing all the actions of the agents, as well as background information about entities. From this graph, we sample subgraphs rooted on security-significant actions taken by the agents. Each subgraph captures the relevant context of the root action in terms of other actions, entities and their relationships. We then prioritize the rooted-subgraphs for auditor review using feed-forward and graph neural networks, as well as nearest neighbors techniques. To alleviate the issue of scarce labeling data, we use contrastive learning and domain-specific data augmentations. Expert auditors label the top ranked subgraphs as ``worth auditing" or ``not worth auditing" based on the company's business policies. This system finds subgraphs that are worth auditing with high enough precision to be used in production.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.

Builds on

3 of 9 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  2. 2023LILAC: Log Parsing using LLMs with Adaptive Parsing Cachecited by 30
  3. 2022TF-GNN: Graph Neural Networks in TensorFlowcited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.