mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Harmless Rawlsian Fairness Regardless of Demographic Prior

arXiv 2411.02467 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.CY stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to privacy and security concerns, recent advancements in group fairness advocate for model training regardless of demographic information. However, most methods still require prior knowledge of demographics. In this study, we explore the potential for achieving fairness without compromising its utility when no prior demographics are provided to the training set, namely harmless Rawlsian fairness. We ascertain that such a fairness requirement with no prior demographic information essential promotes training losses to exhibit a Dirac delta distribution. To this end, we propose a simple but effective method named VFair to minimize the variance of training losses inside the optimal set of empirical losses. This problem is then optimized by a tailored dynamic update approach that operates in both loss and gradient dimensions, directing the model towards relatively fairer solutions while preserving its intact utility. Our experimental findings indicate that regression tasks, which are relatively unexplored from literature, can achieve significant fairness improvement through VFair regardless of any prior, whereas classification tasks usually do not because of their quantized utility measurements. The implementation of our method is publicly available at urlhttps://github.com/wxqpxw/VFair.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  5. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  6. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
  7. 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
  8. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  9. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  10. 2016Variance-based regularization with convex objectivescited by 153
  11. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
  12. 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
11 more
  1. 2021Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labelscited by 65
  2. 2021DORO: Distributional and Outlier Robust Optimizationcited by 54
  3. 2021Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Related Featurescited by 45
  4. 2017Fair Kernel Learningcited by 39
  5. 2022Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with Influencecited by 38
  6. 2020Active Sampling for Min-Max Fairnesscited by 33
  7. 2020The Fairness-Accuracy Pareto Frontcited by 26
  8. 2019ProPublica's COMPAS Data Revisitedcited by 24
  9. 2021Fairness without the sensitive attribute via Causal Variational Autoencodercited by 21
  10. 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
  11. 2021Costs and Benefits of Fair Regressioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.