mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Multiple Dimensions of Trustworthiness in LLMs via Sparse Activation Control

arXiv 2411.02461 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the development and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, enhancing their trustworthiness and aligning them with human preferences has become a critical area of research. Traditional methods rely heavily on extensive data for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), but representation engineering offers a new, training-free approach. This technique leverages semantic features to control the representation of LLM's intermediate hidden states, enabling the model to meet specific requirements such as increased honesty or heightened safety awareness. However, a significant challenge arises when attempting to fulfill multiple requirements simultaneously. It proves difficult to encode various semantic contents, like honesty and safety, into a singular semantic feature, restricting its practicality. In this work, we address this issue through ``Sparse Activation Control''. By delving into the intrinsic mechanisms of LLMs, we manage to identify and pinpoint components that are closely related to specific tasks within the model, i.e., attention heads. These heads display sparse characteristics that allow for near-independent control over different tasks. Our experiments, conducted on the open-source Llama series models, have yielded encouraging results. The models were able to align with human preferences on issues of safety, factuality, and bias concurrently.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.

Builds on

48 of 61 references.

References · 48

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  8. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  9. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  10. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
  11. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  12. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
36 more
  1. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  2. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  3. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  4. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  5. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
  6. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,181
  7. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
  8. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  9. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  10. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  11. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
  12. 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 512
  13. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
  14. 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
  15. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
  16. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Ciphercited by 401
  17. 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
  18. 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
  19. 2024TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Modelscited by 280
  20. 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 276
  21. 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 268
  22. 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Usecited by 209
  23. 2023How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelcited by 199
  24. 2022On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoningcited by 191
  25. 2023Localizing Model Behavior with Path Patchingcited by 182
  26. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 155
  27. 2023Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Modelscited by 152
  28. 2023Does Circuit Analysis Interpretability Scale? Evidence from Multiple Choice Capabilities in Chinchillacited by 145
  29. 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 127
  30. 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 126
  31. 2023Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 125
  32. 2017Natural Language Processing: State of The Art, Current Trends and Challengescited by 114
  33. 2023Explore, Establish, Exploit: Red Teaming Language Models from Scratchcited by 111
  34. 2023Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 94
  35. 2024Navigating the OverKill in Large Language Modelscited by 40
  36. 2023Beyond Surface Statistics: Scene Representations in a Latent Diffusion Modelcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Evaluating LLM Alignment With Human Trust Models
  2. 2023Establishing Trustworthiness: Rethinking Tasks and Model Evaluation
  3. 2026LongAct: Harnessing Intrinsic Activation Patterns for Long-Context Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2025SAFER: Probing Safety in Reward Models with Sparse Autoencoder
  5. 2026LLMs as High-Dimensional Nonlinear Autoregressive Models with Attention: Training, Alignment and Inference
  6. 2025MASteer: Multi-Agent Adaptive Steer Strategy for End-to-End LLM Trustworthiness Repair
  7. 2025Interpretable Reward Model via Sparse Autoencoder
  8. 2024More RLHF, More Trust? On The Impact of Preference Alignment On Trustworthiness