Enhancing Multiple Dimensions of Trustworthiness in LLMs via Sparse Activation Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the development and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, enhancing their trustworthiness and aligning them with human preferences has become a critical area of research. Traditional methods rely heavily on extensive data for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), but representation engineering offers a new, training-free approach. This technique leverages semantic features to control the representation of LLM's intermediate hidden states, enabling the model to meet specific requirements such as increased honesty or heightened safety awareness. However, a significant challenge arises when attempting to fulfill multiple requirements simultaneously. It proves difficult to encode various semantic contents, like honesty and safety, into a singular semantic feature, restricting its practicality. In this work, we address this issue through ``Sparse Activation Control''. By delving into the intrinsic mechanisms of LLMs, we manage to identify and pinpoint components that are closely related to specific tasks within the model, i.e., attention heads. These heads display sparse characteristics that allow for near-independent control over different tasks. Our experiments, conducted on the open-source Llama series models, have yielded encouraging results. The models were able to align with human preferences on issues of safety, factuality, and bias concurrently.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.
Builds on
48 of 61 references.
References · 48
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
36 more
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,181
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 512
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
- 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Ciphercited by 401
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
- 2024TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Modelscited by 280
- 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 276
- 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 268
- 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Usecited by 209
- 2023How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelcited by 199
- 2022On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoningcited by 191
- 2023Localizing Model Behavior with Path Patchingcited by 182
- 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 155
- 2023Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Modelscited by 152
- 2023Does Circuit Analysis Interpretability Scale? Evidence from Multiple Choice Capabilities in Chinchillacited by 145
- 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 127
- 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 126
- 2023Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 125
- 2017Natural Language Processing: State of The Art, Current Trends and Challengescited by 114
- 2023Explore, Establish, Exploit: Red Teaming Language Models from Scratchcited by 111
- 2023Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 94
- 2024Navigating the OverKill in Large Language Modelscited by 40
- 2023Beyond Surface Statistics: Scene Representations in a Latent Diffusion Modelcited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025MemOS: A Memory OS for AI Systemcited by 129
- 2025The Rogue Scalpel: Activation Steering Compromises LLM Safetycited by 18
- 2026ODESteer: A Unified ODE-Based Steering Framework for LLM Alignmentcited by 15
- 2026When is Your LLM Steerable?cited by 2
- 2026A Systematic Study of Training-Free Methods for Trustworthy Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026When is Your LLM Steerable?10 Jun 2026
- 2026A Systematic Study of Training-Free Methods for Trustworthy Large Language Models17 Apr 2026
- 2026ODESteer: A Unified ODE-Based Steering Framework for LLM Alignment19 Feb 2026
- 2025The Rogue Scalpel: Activation Steering Compromises LLM Safety26 Sep 2025
- 2025MemOS: A Memory OS for AI System4 Jul 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Evaluating LLM Alignment With Human Trust Models
- 2023Establishing Trustworthiness: Rethinking Tasks and Model Evaluation
- 2026LongAct: Harnessing Intrinsic Activation Patterns for Long-Context Reinforcement Learning
- 2025SAFER: Probing Safety in Reward Models with Sparse Autoencoder
- 2026LLMs as High-Dimensional Nonlinear Autoregressive Models with Attention: Training, Alignment and Inference
- 2025MASteer: Multi-Agent Adaptive Steer Strategy for End-to-End LLM Trustworthiness Repair
- 2025Interpretable Reward Model via Sparse Autoencoder
- 2024More RLHF, More Trust? On The Impact of Preference Alignment On Trustworthiness