Anomalous Client Detection in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL), with the growing IoT and edge computing, is seen as a promising solution for applications that are latency- and privacy-aware. However, due to the widespread dispersion of data across many clients, it is challenging to monitor client anomalies caused by malfunctioning devices or unexpected events. The majority of FL solutions now in use concentrate on the classification problem, ignoring situations in which anomaly detection may also necessitate privacy preservation and effectiveness. The system in federated learning is unable to manage the potentially flawed behavior of its clients completely. These behaviors include sharing arbitrary parameter values and causing a delay in convergence since clients are chosen at random without knowing the malfunctioning behavior of the client. Client selection is crucial in terms of the efficiency of the federated learning framework. The challenges such as client drift and handling slow clients with low computational capability are well-studied in FL. However, the detection of anomalous clients either for security or for overall performance in the FL frameworks is hardly studied in the literature. In this paper, we propose an anomaly client detection algorithm to overcome malicious client attacks and client drift in FL frameworks. Instead of random client selection, our proposed method utilizes anomaly client detection to remove clients from the FL framework, thereby enhancing the security and efficiency of the overall system. This proposed method improves the global model convergence in almost 50% fewer communication rounds compared with widely used random client selection using the MNIST dataset.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2024.
Builds on
8 of 20 references.
References · 8
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 130
- 2020On the Effectiveness of Mitigating Data Poisoning Attacks with Gradient Shapingcited by 83
- 2020Privacy-preserving Collaborative Learning with Automatic Transformation Searchcited by 31
- 2020An Overview of Federated Deep Learning Privacy Attacks and Defensive Strategiescited by 18
- 2021Surrogate Gradient Field for Latent Space Manipulationcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.