mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generic Embedding-Based Lexicons for Transparent and Reproducible Text Scoring

arXiv 2411.00964 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With text analysis tools becoming increasingly sophisticated over the last decade, researchers now face a decision of whether to use state-of-the-art models that provide high performance but that can be highly opaque in their operations and computationally intensive to run. The alternative, frequently, is to rely on older, manually crafted textual scoring tools that are transparently and easily applied, but can suffer from limited performance. I present an alternative that combines the strengths of both: lexicons created with minimal researcher inputs from generic (pretrained) word embeddings. Presenting a number of conceptual lexicons produced from FastText and GloVe (6B) vector representations of words, I argue that embedding-based lexicons respond to a need for transparent yet high-performance text measuring tools.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2024.

Builds on

7 of 28 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 876
  2. 2013Good Debt or Bad Debt: Detecting Semantic Orientations in Economic Textscited by 310
  3. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 253
  4. 2017Word Affect Intensitiescited by 51
  5. 2019MoralStrength: Exploiting a Moral Lexicon and Embedding Similarity for Moral Foundations Predictioncited by 31
  6. 2017Acquiring Background Knowledge to Improve Moral Value Predictioncited by 22
  7. 2022The Moral Foundations Reddit Corpuscited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.