GLAT: The Generative AI Literacy Assessment Test
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technology into education necessitates precise measurement of GenAI literacy to ensure that learners and educators possess the skills to engage with and critically evaluate this transformative technology effectively. Existing instruments often rely on self-reports, which may be biased. In this study, we present the GenAI Literacy Assessment Test (GLAT), a 20-item multiple-choice instrument developed following established procedures in psychological and educational measurement. Structural validity and reliability were confirmed with responses from 355 higher education students using classical test theory and item response theory, resulting in a reliable 2-parameter logistic (2PL) model (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80; omega total = 0.81) with a robust factor structure (RMSEA = 0.03; CFI = 0.97). Critically, GLAT scores were found to be significant predictors of learners' performance in GenAI-supported tasks, outperforming self-reported measures such as perceived ChatGPT proficiency and demonstrating external validity. These results suggest that GLAT offers a reliable and valid method for assessing GenAI literacy, with the potential to inform educational practices and policy decisions that aim to enhance learners' and educators' GenAI literacy, ultimately equipping them to navigate an AI-enhanced future.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 8.
10 papers.
- 2026How to Assess AI Literacy: Misalignment Between Self-Reported and Objective-Based Measurescited by 2
- 2025The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoningcited by 1
- 2025Understanding Critical Thinking in Generative Artificial Intelligence Use: Development, Validation, and Correlates of the Critical Thinking in AI Use Scalecited by 1
- 2026Framing, Judging, Steering: An Assessable Competency Model for Teach-ing Students to Reason With Generative AIcited by 1
- 2026A paradox of AI fluencycited by 0
- 2026Tracing GenAI Literacy: Uncovering Student-AI Interaction Patterns in Academic Writing through Epistemic Network Analysiscited by 0
- 2026The GenAI Skill Bypass: Mapping Divergent Pathways of University Students and Staff AI Literacycited by 0
- 2026Rethinking Generative AI Literacy: An Integrative, Developmental, and Dialectical Framework for K-12 Teacher Educationcited by 0
- 2026A Survey Instrument to Assess Students' AI and Generative AI Knowledgecited by 0
- 2026Beyond AI Literacy: A Structured Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Measures for Competent Generative-AI Usecited by 0
- 2026Beyond AI Literacy: A Structured Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Measures for Competent Generative-AI Use14 Sep 2026
- 2026Rethinking Generative AI Literacy: An Integrative, Developmental, and Dialectical Framework for K-12 Teacher Education3 Aug 2026
- 2026A Survey Instrument to Assess Students' AI and Generative AI Knowledge31 Jul 2026
- 2026The GenAI Skill Bypass: Mapping Divergent Pathways of University Students and Staff AI Literacy10 Jun 2026
- 2026Framing, Judging, Steering: An Assessable Competency Model for Teach-ing Students to Reason With Generative AI4 Jun 2026
- 2026Tracing GenAI Literacy: Uncovering Student-AI Interaction Patterns in Academic Writing through Epistemic Network Analysis28 Apr 2026
- 2026A paradox of AI fluency28 Apr 2026
- 2026How to Assess AI Literacy: Misalignment Between Self-Reported and Objective-Based Measures3 Jan 2026
- 2025Understanding Critical Thinking in Generative Artificial Intelligence Use: Development, Validation, and Correlates of the Critical Thinking in AI Use Scale13 Dec 2025
- 2025The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning6 Jul 2025