mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit

arXiv 2410.24222 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2024cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gaussian processes (GPs) are non-parametric probabilistic regression models that are popular due to their flexibility, data efficiency, and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. However, standard GP models assume homoskedastic Gaussian noise, while many real-world applications are subject to non-Gaussian corruptions. Variants of GPs that are more robust to alternative noise models have been proposed, and entail significant trade-offs between accuracy and robustness, and between computational requirements and theoretical guarantees. In this work, we propose and study a GP model that achieves robustness against sparse outliers by inferring data-point-specific noise levels with a sequential selection procedure maximizing the log marginal likelihood that we refer to as relevance pursuit. We show, surprisingly, that the model can be parameterized such that the associated log marginal likelihood is strongly concave in the data-point-specific noise variances, a property rarely found in either robust regression objectives or GP marginal likelihoods. This in turn implies the weak submodularity of the corresponding subset selection problem, and thereby proves approximation guarantees for the proposed algorithm. We compare the model's performance relative to other approaches on diverse regression and Bayesian optimization tasks, including the challenging but common setting of sparse corruptions of the labels within or close to the function range.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2024.

Builds on

22 of 66 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
  2. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
  3. 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 149
  4. 2017Batched Large-scale Bayesian Optimization in High-dimensional Spacescited by 117
  5. 2016Restricted Strong Convexity Implies Weak Submodularitycited by 52
  6. 2014Student-t Processes as Alternatives to Gaussian Processescited by 45
  7. 2017Scalable Log Determinants for Gaussian Process Kernel Learningcited by 35
  8. 2022Discovering Many Diverse Solutions with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 31
  9. 2022Bayesian Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Gaussian Processescited by 26
  10. 2021Autonomous synthesis of metastable materialscited by 23
  11. 2023Self-Correcting Bayesian Optimization through Bayesian Active Learningcited by 22
  12. 2023Robust and Conjugate Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 14
10 more
  1. 2017A Unified Optimization View on Generalized Matching Pursuit and Frank-Wolfecited by 13
  2. 2024Scaling Gaussian Processes for Learning Curve Prediction via Latent Kronecker Structurecited by 10
  3. 2018On Matching Pursuit and Coordinate Descentcited by 7
  4. 2021Sparse Bayesian Learning via Stepwise Regressioncited by 6
  5. 2023Robust Gaussian Process Regression with Huber Likelihoodcited by 6
  6. 2020Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Bias Modelcited by 5
  7. 2017Robust Bayesian Optimization with Student-t Likelihoodcited by 4
  8. 2020Robust Gaussian Process Regression Based on Iterative Trimmingcited by 4
  9. 2021On the Optimality of Backward Regression: Sparse Recovery and Subset Selectioncited by 3
  10. 2021Performance guarantees of forward and reverse greedy algorithms for minimizing nonsupermodular nonsubmodular functions on a matroidcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.