When can classical neural networks represent quantum states?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A naive classical representation of an n-qubit state requires specifying exponentially many amplitudes in the computational basis. Past works have demonstrated that classical neural networks can succinctly express these amplitudes for many physically relevant states, leading to computationally powerful representations known as neural quantum states. What underpins the efficacy of such representations? We show that conditional correlations present in the measurement distribution of quantum states control the performance of their neural representations. Such conditional correlations are basis dependent, arise due to measurement-induced entanglement, and reveal features not accessible through conventional few-body correlations often examined in studies of phases of matter. By combining theoretical and numerical analysis, we demonstrate how the state's entanglement and sign structure, along with the choice of measurement basis, give rise to distinct patterns of short- or long-range conditional correlations. Our findings provide a rigorous framework for exploring the expressive power of neural quantum states.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2024.
Builds on
16 of 77 references.
References · 16
- 2023RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Eracited by 814
- 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 567
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
- 2019Ab-Initio Solution of the Many-Electron Schr"odinger Equation with Deep Neural Networkscited by 195
- 2015Representation Benefits of Deep Feedforward Networkscited by 84
- 2018A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systemscited by 70
- 2019Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learningcited by 37
- 2021NetKet 3: Machine Learning Toolbox for Many-Body Quantum Systemscited by 27
- 2021Neural tensor contractions and the expressive power of deep neural quantum statescited by 21
- 2020Neural network wave functions and the sign problemcited by 20
- 2022From Tensor Network Quantum States to Tensorial Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2019(Pseudo) Random Quantum States with Binary Phasecited by 10
4 more
- 2024Certifying almost all quantum states with few single-qubit measurementscited by 7
- 2023Investigating Topological Order using Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2023Empirical Sample Complexity of Neural Network Mixed State Reconstructioncited by 4
- 2024Positive bias makes tensor-network contraction tractablecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systemscited by 9
- 2025Probing Quantum Spin Systems with Kolmogorov-Arnold Neural Network Quantum Statescited by 1
- 2025Adaptive Neural Quantum States: A Recurrent Neural Network Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026Geometry-Induced Long-Range Correlations in Recurrent Neural Network Quantum Statescited by 1
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability and Causal Feature Steering of Neural Quantum States via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 1
- 2025Exploring the Effect of Basis Rotation on NQS Performancecited by 0
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability and Causal Feature Steering of Neural Quantum States via Sparse Autoencoders1 Jul 2026
- 2026Geometry-Induced Long-Range Correlations in Recurrent Neural Network Quantum States9 Apr 2026
- 2025Exploring the Effect of Basis Rotation on NQS Performance19 Dec 2025
- 2025Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systems5 Sep 2025
- 2025Adaptive Neural Quantum States: A Recurrent Neural Network Perspective24 Jul 2025
- 2025Probing Quantum Spin Systems with Kolmogorov-Arnold Neural Network Quantum States2 Jun 2025