Danoliteracy of Generative Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The language technology moonshot moment of Generative Large Language Models (GLLMs) was not limited to English: These models brought a surge of technological applications, investments, and hype to low-resource languages as well. However, the capabilities of these models in languages such as Danish were, until recently, difficult to verify beyond qualitative demonstrations due to a lack of applicable evaluation corpora. We present a GLLM benchmark to evaluate Danoliteracy, a measure of Danish language and cultural competency across eight diverse scenarios such as Danish citizenship tests and abstractive social media question answering. This limited-size benchmark was found to produce a robust ranking that correlates to human feedback at ρ ~ 0.8 with GPT-4 and Claude Opus models achieving the highest rankings. Analyzing these model results across scenarios, we find one strong underlying factor explaining 95% of scenario performance variance for GLLMs in Danish, suggesting a g factor of model consistency in language adaptation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2024.
Builds on
7 of 37 references.
References · 7
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2023MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIcited by 293
- 2023Okapi: Instruction-tuned Large Language Models in Multiple Languages with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 190
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.