The State of Data Curation at NeurIPS: An Assessment of Dataset Development Practices in the Datasets and Benchmarks Track
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data curation is a field with origins in librarianship and archives, whose scholarship and thinking on data issues go back centuries, if not millennia. The field of machine learning is increasingly observing the importance of data curation to the advancement of both applications and fundamental understanding of machine learning models - evidenced not least by the creation of the Datasets and Benchmarks track itself. This work provides an analysis of dataset development practices at NeurIPS through the lens of data curation. We present an evaluation framework for dataset documentation, consisting of a rubric and toolkit developed through a literature review of data curation principles. We use the framework to assess the strengths and weaknesses in current dataset development practices of 60 datasets published in the NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks track from 2021-2023. We summarize key findings and trends. Results indicate greater need for documentation about environmental footprint, ethical considerations, and data management. We suggest targeted strategies and resources to improve documentation in these areas and provide recommendations for the NeurIPS peer-review process that prioritize rigorous data curation in ML. Finally, we provide results in the format of a dataset that showcases aspects of recommended data curation practices. Our rubric and results are of interest for improving data curation practices broadly in the field of ML as well as to data curation and science and technology studies scholars studying practices in ML. Our aim is to support continued improvement in interdisciplinary research on dataset practices, ultimately improving the reusability and reproducibility of new datasets and benchmarks, enabling standardized and informed human oversight, and strengthening the foundation of rigorous and responsible ML research.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025Do Not Trust Licenses You See: Dataset Compliance Requires Massive-Scale AI-Powered Lifecycle Tracingcited by 4
- 2025TechOps: Technical Documentation Templates for the AI Actcited by 3
- 2026From Reflection to Repair: A Scoping Review of Dataset Documentation Toolscited by 1
- 2026SteelBench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models in Real-World Industrial Environmentscited by 1
- 2026AdaQE-CG: Adaptive Query Expansion for Web-Scale Generative AI Model and Data Card Generationcited by 0
- 2026Dynamic Shapley Computationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Average Error through Oracle-Informed Stress Tests for Time-Series Forecastingcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Average Error through Oracle-Informed Stress Tests for Time-Series Forecasting19 Sep 2026
- 2026SteelBench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models in Real-World Industrial Environments6 Jul 2026
- 2026Dynamic Shapley Computation20 May 2026
- 2026AdaQE-CG: Adaptive Query Expansion for Web-Scale Generative AI Model and Data Card Generation16 Mar 2026
- 2026From Reflection to Repair: A Scoping Review of Dataset Documentation Tools17 Feb 2026
- 2025TechOps: Technical Documentation Templates for the AI Act12 Aug 2025
- 2025Do Not Trust Licenses You See: Dataset Compliance Requires Massive-Scale AI-Powered Lifecycle Tracing4 Mar 2025